H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Chris Evert vs Tracy Austin H2H: 7-9

Tracy Austin holds a 9–7 lead over Chris Evert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 16 main-draw meetings, Tracy Austin leads 6–1 on carpet, while Chris Evert leads 4–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1982 East Rutherford semifinal 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
7 – 9
16 main-draw meetings
Tracy Austin
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Evert 6-0 6-0 Tracy Austin Match data Dec 19, 1982* SF East Rutherford WTA 250 Hard
Tracy Austin 6-1 6-2 Chris Evert Match data Dec 19, 1981* SF East Rutherford WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 4-6 6-4 7-6(7) Tracy Austin Match data Dec 18, 1981* R16 East Rutherford WTA 250 Carpet
Tracy Austin 6-1 6-4 Chris Evert Match data Aug 23, 1981* F Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Chris Evert 4-6 6-1 6-1 Tracy Austin Match data Sep 7, 1980* SF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Tracy Austin 6-2 6-1 Chris Evert Match data Jan 13, 1980* F Cincinnati Open WTA 250 Carpet
Tracy Austin 6-3 6-0 Chris Evert Match data Jan 7, 1980* SF Landover WTA 250 Carpet
Tracy Austin 6-1 6-3 Chris Evert Match data Jan 6, 1980* R16 Landover WTA 250 Carpet
Tracy Austin 6-3 7-5 Chris Evert Match data Nov 10, 1979* SF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 250 Carpet
Tracy Austin 6-4 6-3 Chris Evert Match data Sep 10, 1979* F US Open Grand Slam Hard
Chris Evert 6-7 6-4 6-1 Tracy Austin Match data Aug 26, 1979* F Mahwah WTA 250 Hard
Tracy Austin 6-4 2-6 7-6 Chris Evert Match data May 12, 1979* SF Italian Open WTA 250 Clay
Tracy Austin 6-3 6-1 Chris Evert Match data Mar 21, 1979 RR WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Chris Evert 7-5 6-1 Tracy Austin Match data Sep 8, 1978* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Chris Evert 6-3 6-1 Tracy Austin Match data Apr 15, 1978* SF Hilton Head WTA 250 Clay
Chris Evert 6-1 6-1 Tracy Austin Match data Jun 26, 1977* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,610 1,228 158 88.6% 18 0 5 13 112 154
Tracy Austin #81 #1 19 2,502 339 88 79.4% 2 0 1 5 20 28

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Tracy Austin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 1977 14–8 63.6% — 1,780 0 1
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,744 0 4 1978 43–13 76.8% #6 2,057 0 2
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,003 0 11 1979 73–12 85.9% #3 2,431 1 9
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,249 0 15 1980 81–10 89.0% #2 2,450 1 19
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,374 0 27 1981 56–7 88.9% #2 2,442 2 27
19 1974 97–7 93.3% — 2,450 2 40 1982 35–12 74.5% #4 2,262 2 28
20 1975 85–7 92.4% #1 2,544 4 53 1983 24–8 75.0% #9 2,185 2 28
21 1976 63–5 92.6% #1 2,545 6 62 1984 2–2 50.0% #27 2,136 2 28
22 1977 63–4 94.0% #1 2,568 7 73 — — — — — — —
23 1978 49–4 92.5% #2 2,607 8 80 — — — — — — —
24 1979 81–14 85.3% #2 2,440 9 87 — — — — — — —
25 1980 66–9 88.0% #1 2,468 11 95 — — — — — — —
26 1981 64–9 87.7% #1 2,475 12 103 1989 0–2 0.0% — 2,078 2 28
27 1982 66–6 91.7% #2 2,491 14 112 — — — — — — —
28 1983 59–11 84.3% #2 2,400 15 118 — — — — — — —
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,409 16 124 — — — — — — —
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,428 17 133 1993 6–6 50.0% #117 1,970 2 28
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,422 18 139 1994 5–8 38.5% #81 1,850 2 28
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,334 18 144 — — — — — — —
33 1988 62–13 82.7% #3 2,285 18 148 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,167 18 148 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chris Evert Tracy Austin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1977 4 2 6 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
15 1970 — — — — 14 2 16 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1978 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 13 3 16 81.3%
16 1971 — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1979 22 4 26 84.6% 10 0 10 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 33 6 39 84.6%
17 1972 3 1 4 75.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 18 3 21 85.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1980 18 4 22 81.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 11 1 12 91.7% 44 4 48 91.7%
18 1973 17 1 18 94.4% 46 4 50 92.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 8 0 8 100.0% 1981 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 20 4 24 83.3%
19 1974 19 1 20 95.0% 40 0 40 100.0% 24 2 26 92.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1982 11 2 13 84.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 15 6 21 71.4%
20 1975 26 2 28 92.9% 36 0 36 100.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 3 21 85.7% 1983 — — — — 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 12 5 17 70.6%
21 1976 12 1 13 92.3% 11 0 11 100.0% 9 0 9 100.0% 31 4 35 88.6% 1984 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1977 12 0 12 100.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 31 2 33 93.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1978 17 0 17 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1979 18 4 22 81.8% 20 1 21 95.2% 12 1 13 92.3% 31 8 39 79.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 23 8 31 74.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 14 2 16 87.5% 25 1 26 96.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1982 24 1 25 96.0% 22 2 24 91.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 21 1 22 95.5% 24 3 27 88.9% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 21 2 23 91.3% 21 1 22 95.5% 16 2 18 88.9% 19 3 22 86.4% 1993 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
31 1986 21 2 23 91.3% 20 1 21 95.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 10 2 12 83.3% 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 1987 18 5 23 78.3% 23 2 25 92.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 18 3 21 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 33 6 39 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 326 37 363 89.8% 418 26 444 94.1% 205 33 238 86.1% 279 62 341 81.8% — 101 26 127 79.5% 44 13 57 77.2% 49 14 63 77.8% 141 34 175 80.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chris Evert Tracy Austin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1969 1560 117.6 — — — — — +24 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 — — +0.13 1977 1780 149.9 — — — — -85 -30 — 59.1% +0.55 2–0 1–0 — -1.15
15 1970 1745 152.4 — — — — — +83 — 77.1% +2.63 0–1 2–0 — -0.34 1978 2057 163.2 — — — — +12 -252 -337 72.6% +1.96 6–3 (67%) 7–2 (78%) 108.8 -0.48
16 1971 2004 157.6 — — — — — +17 -224 85.9% +3.36 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 107.3 +1.65 1979 2431 178.8 — — — — +6 -369 -545 80.9% +2.33 13–3 (81%) 6–3 (67%) 110.9 -9.11
17 1972 2250 173.8 — — — — -437 +32 -205 82.6% +2.69 5–2 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 107.2 -7.71 1980 2451 179.3 — — — — +144 -317 -403 85.3% +3.11 12–3 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 104.4 -3.63
18 1973 2374 178.1 — — — — -194 +102 -190 87.7% +3.21 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 110.6 -5.17 1981 2442 175.7 — — — — +118 -334 -333 84.6% +2.88 7–3 (70%) 7–4 (64%) 101.7 -3.49
19 1974 2450 180.5 — — — — -56 +162 -92 88.2% +3.37 12–4 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 101.3 -5.59 1982 2263 167.1 — — — — +182 -144 -203 75.5% +2.05 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 94.0 -1.08
20 1975 2544 181.4 — — — — -55 +162 -225 89.2% +3.37 8–3 (73%) 6–2 (75%) 104.4 -5.18 1983 2186 159.6 — — — — +138 -57 -80 76.5% +1.88 2–4 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 94.9 -1.73
21 1976 2546 179.8 — — — — +44 +128 -121 86.5% +3.11 10–2 (83%) 6–4 (60%) 101.6 -3.21 1984 2137 114.9 — — — — +108 — — 50.0% +0.13 — — — +0.03
22 1977 2568 181.6 — — — — +148 +144 -101 90.7% +3.33 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 104.6 -2.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1978 2608 179.5 — — — — +105 +63 -131 87.1% +3.14 9–3 (75%) 1–1 — -2.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1979 2440 178.4 — — — — +13 +292 +61 81.2% +2.78 12–2 (86%) 3–4 (43%) 99.2 -3.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 2469 177.6 — — — — +80 +330 +100 82.6% +2.79 13–0 (100%) 2–4 (33%) 105.1 -4.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 2476 182.2 — — — — +9 +291 +130 86.1% +3.10 9–2 (82%) 7–1 (88%) 105.6 -3.95 1989 2079 101.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.04
27 1982 2491 179.3 — — — — +62 +255 +73 88.2% +3.33 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 98.0 -4.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 2400 176.5 — — — — +47 +316 +178 79.9% +2.28 10–3 (77%) 6–3 (67%) 97.9 -4.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 2410 175.5 — — — — +69 +207 +137 82.8% +2.90 11–2 (85%) 2–4 (33%) 99.3 -4.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 2429 176.4 — — — — +30 +241 +127 85.9% +2.88 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 98.8 -3.55 1993 1970 123.3 — — — — +25 — — 46.4% -0.97 3–1 (75%) — — -0.65
31 1986 2423 177.3 — — — — +9 +241 +113 83.6% +2.78 10–0 (100%) 4–3 (57%) 104.6 -3.45 1994 1851 118.5 — — — — +76 +127 — 36.7% -0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -1.54
32 1987 2335 176.3 — — — — +23 +294 +200 81.9% +2.62 7–6 (54%) 4–1 (80%) 96.2 -4.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 2286 173.9 — — — — +34 +319 +231 79.0% +2.37 11–2 (85%) 5–4 (56%) 101.2 -3.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 2167 158.6 — — — — +40 +347 +265 73.8% +1.59 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 93.3 -2.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2610 182.0 — — — — +21 +194 -3 84.5% +2.92 164–50 (77%) 82–50 (62%) 105.8 -5.37 — 2502 175.2 — — — — +84 -168 -342 76.2% +2.12 52–25 (68%) 33–14 (70%) 109.1 -5.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.