H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Chris Evert vs Tracy Austin H2H: 7-9

Tracy Austin holds a 9–7 lead over Chris Evert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 16 main-draw meetings, Tracy Austin leads 6–1 on carpet, while Chris Evert leads 4–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1982 East Rutherford semifinal 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
7 – 9
16 main-draw meetings
Tracy Austin
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Evert 6-0 6-0 Tracy Austin Match data Dec 19, 1982* SF East Rutherford WTA 250 Hard
Tracy Austin 6-1 6-2 Chris Evert Match data Dec 19, 1981* SF East Rutherford WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 4-6 6-4 7-6(7) Tracy Austin Match data Dec 18, 1981* R16 East Rutherford WTA 250 Carpet
Tracy Austin 6-1 6-4 Chris Evert Match data Aug 23, 1981* F Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Chris Evert 4-6 6-1 6-1 Tracy Austin Match data Sep 7, 1980* SF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Tracy Austin 6-2 6-1 Chris Evert Match data Jan 13, 1980* F Cincinnati Open WTA 250 Carpet
Tracy Austin 6-3 6-0 Chris Evert Match data Jan 7, 1980* SF Landover WTA 250 Carpet
Tracy Austin 6-1 6-3 Chris Evert Match data Jan 6, 1980* R16 Landover WTA 250 Carpet
Tracy Austin 6-3 7-5 Chris Evert Match data Nov 10, 1979* SF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 500 Carpet
Tracy Austin 6-4 6-3 Chris Evert Match data Sep 10, 1979* F US Open Grand Slam Hard
Chris Evert 6-7 6-4 6-1 Tracy Austin Match data Aug 26, 1979* F Mahwah WTA 250 Hard
Tracy Austin 6-4 2-6 7-6 Chris Evert Match data May 12, 1979* SF Italian Open WTA 250 Clay
Tracy Austin 6-3 6-1 Chris Evert Match data Mar 21, 1979 RR WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Chris Evert 7-5 6-1 Tracy Austin Match data Sep 8, 1978* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Chris Evert 6-3 6-1 Tracy Austin Match data Apr 15, 1978* SF Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay
Chris Evert 6-1 6-1 Tracy Austin Match data Jun 26, 1977* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chris Evert — #1 231 2,617 1,246 158 88.7% 18 0 5 19 112 154
Tracy Austin — #1 19 2,522 341 88 79.5% 2 0 1 12 15 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Tracy Austin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 0 1977 14–8 63.6% — 1,780 0 1
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,744 0 0 1978 44–13 77.2% #6 2,087 0 3
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,003 0 4 1979 73–12 85.9% #3 2,436 1 10
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,249 0 8 1980 82–10 89.1% #2 2,463 1 21
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,374 0 20 1981 56–7 88.9% #2 2,449 2 29
19 1974 100–7 93.5% — 2,459 2 36 1982 35–12 74.5% #4 2,267 2 30
20 1975 88–7 92.6% #1 2,560 4 52 1983 24–8 75.0% #9 2,189 2 30
21 1976 71–5 93.4% #1 2,566 6 64 1984 2–2 50.0% — 2,139 2 30
22 1977 63–4 94.0% #1 2,580 7 75 — — — — — — —
23 1978 49–4 92.5% #2 2,614 8 82 — — — — — — —
24 1979 82–14 85.4% #2 2,444 9 90 — — — — — — —
25 1980 66–9 88.0% #1 2,471 11 98 — — — — — — —
26 1981 65–9 87.8% #1 2,480 12 107 1989 0–2 0.0% — 2,081 2 30
27 1982 67–6 91.8% #2 2,497 14 117 — — — — — — —
28 1983 59–11 84.3% #2 2,403 15 123 — — — — — — —
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,412 16 129 — — — — — — —
30 1985 78–8 90.7% #2 2,434 17 139 1993 6–6 50.0% #117 1,972 2 30
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,425 18 145 1994 5–8 38.5% — 1,852 2 30
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,336 18 150 — — — — — — —
33 1988 62–13 82.7% #3 2,286 18 154 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,167 18 154 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chris Evert Tracy Austin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1977 4 2 6 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
15 1970 — — — — 14 2 16 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1978 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 13 3 16 81.3%
16 1971 — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1979 22 4 26 84.6% 10 0 10 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 33 6 39 84.6%
17 1972 3 1 4 75.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 18 3 21 85.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1980 19 4 23 82.6% 8 1 9 88.9% 11 1 12 91.7% 44 4 48 91.7%
18 1973 17 1 18 94.4% 46 4 50 92.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 8 0 8 100.0% 1981 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 20 4 24 83.3%
19 1974 19 1 20 95.0% 42 0 42 100.0% 24 2 26 92.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1982 11 2 13 84.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 15 6 21 71.4%
20 1975 27 2 29 93.1% 37 0 37 100.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 3 21 85.7% 1983 — — — — 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 12 5 17 70.6%
21 1976 15 1 16 93.8% 11 0 11 100.0% 13 0 13 100.0% 31 4 35 88.6% 1984 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1977 12 0 12 100.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 31 2 33 93.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1978 17 0 17 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1979 19 4 23 82.6% 20 1 21 95.2% 12 1 13 92.3% 31 8 39 79.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 23 8 31 74.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 15 2 17 88.2% 25 1 26 96.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1982 24 1 25 96.0% 23 2 25 92.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 21 1 22 95.5% 24 3 27 88.9% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 21 2 23 91.3% 22 1 23 95.7% 16 2 18 88.9% 19 3 22 86.4% 1993 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
31 1986 21 2 23 91.3% 20 1 21 95.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 10 2 12 83.3% 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 1987 18 5 23 78.3% 23 2 25 92.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 18 3 21 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 33 6 39 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 332 37 369 90.0% 423 26 449 94.2% 209 33 242 86.4% 279 62 341 81.8% — 102 26 128 79.7% 44 13 57 77.2% 49 14 63 77.8% 141 34 175 80.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chris Evert Tracy Austin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1969 1560 117.6 — — — — — +24 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 — — +0.13 1977 1781 150.1 — — — — -85 -31 — 59.1% +0.55 2–0 1–0 — -1.01
15 1970 1745 152.4 — — — — — +83 — 77.1% +2.63 0–1 2–0 — -0.34 1978 2087 165.9 — — — — -15 -282 -367 73.1% +2.01 6–3 (67%) 7–2 (78%) 108.9 -2.13
16 1971 2004 157.6 — — — — — +17 -224 85.9% +3.36 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 107.3 +1.65 1979 2436 178.9 — — — — +5 -373 -551 80.9% +2.33 13–3 (81%) 6–3 (67%) 110.9 -8.70
17 1972 2250 173.8 — — — — -437 +32 -205 82.6% +2.69 5–2 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 107.2 -8.05 1980 2464 180.2 — — — — +151 -327 -415 85.5% +3.11 12–3 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -4.53
18 1973 2374 178.1 — — — — -194 +102 -190 87.7% +3.21 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 110.6 -5.25 1981 2450 175.9 — — — — +119 -339 -340 84.6% +2.88 7–3 (70%) 7–4 (64%) 101.5 -3.61
19 1974 2460 181.1 — — — — -66 +155 -101 88.4% +3.39 12–4 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 101.3 -5.58 1982 2267 167.2 — — — — +185 -147 -207 75.5% +2.05 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 94.0 -1.41
20 1975 2561 182.1 — — — — -54 +157 -241 88.9% +3.34 9–3 (75%) 7–2 (78%) 105.5 -5.39 1983 2189 159.8 — — — — +140 -59 -83 76.5% +1.88 2–4 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 94.9 -1.86
21 1976 2567 181.1 — — — — +42 +122 -103 87.8% +3.12 10–2 (83%) 8–4 (67%) 102.4 -3.25 1984 2140 115.0 — — — — +111 — — 50.0% +0.13 — — — +0.03
22 1977 2581 181.8 — — — — +147 +142 -83 90.7% +3.33 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 104.4 -2.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1978 2615 179.6 — — — — +109 +62 -113 87.1% +3.14 9–3 (75%) 1–1 — -2.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1979 2445 178.7 — — — — +15 +298 +73 81.0% +2.77 13–2 (87%) 3–4 (43%) 99.7 -3.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 2472 177.7 — — — — +82 +339 +114 82.6% +2.79 13–0 (100%) 2–4 (33%) 105.0 -4.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 2480 182.5 — — — — +11 +299 +140 86.3% +3.09 9–2 (82%) 7–1 (88%) 105.5 -4.00 1989 2082 101.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.05
27 1982 2497 179.5 — — — — +60 +259 +77 88.4% +3.34 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 97.9 -4.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 2404 176.6 — — — — +46 +319 +184 79.9% +2.28 10–3 (77%) 6–3 (67%) 97.9 -4.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 2412 175.6 — — — — +69 +210 +144 82.8% +2.90 11–2 (85%) 2–4 (33%) 99.2 -4.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 2434 176.7 — — — — +28 +244 +130 86.0% +2.88 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 98.7 -3.85 1993 1973 123.4 — — — — +28 — — 46.4% -0.97 3–1 (75%) — — -0.65
31 1986 2426 177.4 — — — — +7 +245 +117 83.6% +2.78 10–0 (100%) 4–3 (57%) 104.6 -3.46 1994 1852 118.5 — — — — +78 +126 — 36.7% -0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -1.54
32 1987 2336 176.4 — — — — +22 +298 +206 81.9% +2.62 7–6 (54%) 4–1 (80%) 96.1 -4.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 2287 173.9 — — — — +33 +322 +236 79.0% +2.37 11–2 (85%) 5–4 (56%) 101.1 -3.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 2168 158.7 — — — — +39 +352 +268 73.8% +1.59 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 93.3 -2.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2617 182.2 — — — — +20 +195 0 84.6% +2.92 166–50 (77%) 85–50 (63%) 106.2 -5.42 — 2522 175.8 — — — — +83 -173 -353 76.3% +2.13 52–25 (68%) 33–14 (70%) 108.9 -5.99

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.