H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Chris Matison vs Sue Barker H2H: 0-3
Sue Barker holds a 3–0 lead over Chris Matison in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sue Barker leads 3–0 on grass. Most recently, Sue Barker won the 1975 Sydney quarterfinal 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 1975* | Sydney | WTA 500 | QF | Grass | Sue Barker | 6-1 6-3 | Chris Matison | Match data |
| Dec 15, 1974* | Hobart | WTA 250 | F | Grass | Sue Barker | 6-4 6-2 | Chris Matison | Match data |
| Dec 12, 1974* | Perth | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Sue Barker | 7-5 6-2 | Chris Matison | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Matison | — | — | — | 1,615 | 51 | 70 | 42.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Chris Matison | Sue Barker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,450 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 1972 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 |
| 1973 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 |
| 1974 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 |
| 1975 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 |
| 1976 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 |
| 1977 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 |
| 1978 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 |
| 1980 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 |
| 1981 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 |