H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Chris Oneil vs Amanda Brown H2H: 1-0

Chris Oneil holds a 1–0 lead over Amanda Brown in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chris Oneil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Oneil won the 1983 Kansas City round of 16 6-4 7-5.

AUS Age 70 Right-Handed
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Oneil 6-4 7-5 Amanda Brown Match data Sep 23, 1983* R16 Kansas City WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chris Oneil 1,766 99 108 47.8% 1 0 0 2 6 9
Amanda Brown 1,653 48 55 46.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Oneil Amanda Brown
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–3 25.0% 1,475 0 0
16 1972 6–3 66.7% 1,547 0 2 1981 9–4 69.2% 1,559 0 0
17 1973 0–3 0.0% 1,502 0 2 1982 12–4 75.0% 1,635 0 0
18 1974 10–12 45.5% 1,588 0 2 1983 7–12 36.8% 1,595 0 1
19 1975 30–17 63.8% 1,661 0 4 1984 14–18 43.8% 1,611 0 1
20 1976 14–6 70.0% 1,691 0 7 1985 5–13 27.8% 1,577 0 1
21 1977 2–5 28.6% 1,638 0 7 1986 0–1 0.0% 1,556 0 1
22 1978 13–12 52.0% 1,716 1 8
23 1979 7–12 36.8% 1,630 1 8
24 1980 5–8 38.5% 1,575 1 8
25 1981 4–9 30.8% 1,552 1 9
26 1982 3–6 33.3% 1,595 1 9
27 1983 5–15 25.0% 1,526 1 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chris Oneil Amanda Brown
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1972 3 0 3 100.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1981 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1973 0 3 3 0.0% 1982 2 0 2 100.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1974 4 4 8 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1983 2 4 6 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1975 18 5 23 78.3% 10 8 18 55.6% 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1976 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
24 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1981 0 5 5 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1983 2 6 8 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
Career 4 11 15 26.7% 33 37 70 47.1% 46 48 94 48.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 13 15 28 46.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 11 19 30 36.7% 2 6 8 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chris Oneil Amanda Brown
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1476 101.6 25.0% -1.00 -0.05
16 1972 1548 107.2 +39 +1 57.9% +0.53 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 104.5 +1.29 1981 1560 119.3 66.7% +1.15 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.47
17 1973 1503 96.5 -14 14.3% -2.00 0–1 0–2 +0.32 1982 1635 123.4 -58 73.5% +2.32 1–1 2–0 +2.21
18 1974 1589 130.7 +28 -30 49.0% -0.18 2–5 (29%) 1–1 -0.21 1983 1596 107.2 -21 -2 38.1% -0.79 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +0.68
19 1975 1661 134.9 +126 -23 61.8% +0.86 5–3 (63%) 7–1 (88%) 106.5 +3.59 1984 1611 109.9 -60 -13 +27 44.6% -0.58 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 103.1 +1.65
20 1976 1691 124.2 +57 -6 68.2% +1.39 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.3 +2.35 1985 1578 109.4 -9 -25 29.3% -1.41 3–2 (60%) 1–1 -0.07
21 1977 1638 111.9 +4 35.3% -0.53 1–2 (33%) 1–0 +0.42 1986 1556 98.8 33.3% -1.33 0–1 +0.31
22 1978 1716 126.6 -151 -47 +65 49.1% 0.00 4–3 (57%) 1–1 +1.21
23 1979 1631 118.0 -44 -33 +83 43.2% -0.55 3–5 (38%) 1–0 +1.29
24 1980 1576 99.2 -18 +119 37.9% -0.79 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 98.2 +0.16
25 1981 1552 111.1 -52 +127 39.3% -1.11 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) +0.74
26 1982 1596 132.3 -112 +127 38.1% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 100.0 -1.11
27 1983 1527 99.9 -38 -41 +147 27.3% -1.34 2–2 (50%) 0–5 (0%) 95.9 +0.78
Career 1766 128.0 -62 +33 +36 48.6% -0.06 25–30 (45%) 19–17 (53%) 100.0 +5.26 1654 115.8 -38 -36 +1 46.7% -0.16 12–13 (48%) 13–8 (62%) 102.5 +5.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.