H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Chris Oneil vs Betsy Nagelsen H2H: 1-2
Betsy Nagelsen holds a 2–1 lead over Chris Oneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Chris Oneil leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Betsy Nagelsen won the 1983 Tokyo Japan Open fourth round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 1983* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R16 | — | Betsy Nagelsen | 7-6 6-3 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
| Dec 25, 1978 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | F | Grass | Chris Oneil | 6-3 7-6 | Betsy Nagelsen | Match data |
| Jul 17, 1975* | Annapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | — | Betsy Nagelsen | 6-4 6-4 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Oneil | — | — | — | 1,768 | 99 | 108 | 47.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| Betsy Nagelsen | #692 | #25 | 28 | 1,885 | 266 | 324 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Chris Oneil | Betsy Nagelsen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 1 |
| 1973 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 1974 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 27–18 | 60.0% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 3 |
| 1975 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 3 |
| 1976 | 14–6 | 70.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 3 |
| 1977 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,636 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 3 |
| 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,714 | 1 | 8 | 1978 | 13–24 | 35.1% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 3 |
| 1979 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,632 | 1 | 8 | 1979 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,695 | 0 | 5 |
| 1980 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,577 | 1 | 8 | 1980 | 22–27 | 44.9% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 5 |
| 1981 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,555 | 1 | 9 | 1981 | 20–21 | 48.8% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 6 |
| 1982 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,598 | 1 | 9 | 1982 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 6 |
| 1983 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,528 | 1 | 9 | 1983 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #77 | 1,630 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #81 | 1,714 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #46 | 1,699 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #61 | 1,645 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #109 | 1,586 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #45 | 1,663 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,640 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #337 | 1,608 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #418 | 1,561 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #394 | 1,512 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,510 | 0 | 6 |