H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Chris Oneil vs Candy Reynolds H2H: 1-0
Chris Oneil holds a 1–0 lead over Candy Reynolds in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chris Oneil leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Chris Oneil won the 1982 Sydney second round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 1982* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Chris Oneil | 6-3 7-6 | Candy Reynolds | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Oneil | — | — | — | 1,768 | 99 | 108 | 47.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| Candy Reynolds | #485 | #76 | 5 | 1,859 | 84 | 140 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Chris Oneil | Candy Reynolds | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 14–6 | 70.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,419 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,636 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,714 | 1 | 8 | 1980 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,632 | 1 | 8 | 1981 | 19–17 | 52.8% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,577 | 1 | 8 | 1982 | 17–22 | 43.6% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,555 | 1 | 9 | 1983 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,598 | 1 | 9 | 1984 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,528 | 1 | 9 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #177 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #251 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #485 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |