H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Chris Oneil vs Diane Morrison H2H: 0-1

Diane Morrison holds a 1–0 lead over Chris Oneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Diane Morrison leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Diane Morrison won the 1979 Melbourne round of 32 3-6 6-2 6-4.

AUS Age 70 Right-Handed
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Diane Morrison 3-6 6-2 6-4 Chris Oneil Match data Nov 29, 1979* R32 Melbourne WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chris Oneil 1,766 99 108 47.8% 1 0 0 2 6 9
Diane Morrison 1,694 41 43 48.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Oneil Diane Morrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 2–1 66.7% 1,520 0 0
15 1974 0–1 0.0% 1,504 0 0
16 1972 6–3 66.7% 1,547 0 2
17 1973 0–3 0.0% 1,502 0 2
18 1974 10–12 45.5% 1,588 0 2 1977 1–1 50.0% 1,507 0 0
19 1975 30–17 63.8% 1,661 0 4
20 1976 14–6 70.0% 1,691 0 7 1979 17–11 60.7% 1,675 0 1
21 1977 2–5 28.6% 1,638 0 7 1980 9–22 29.0% 1,593 0 1
22 1978 13–12 52.0% 1,716 1 8 1981 12–7 63.2% 1,636 0 1
23 1979 7–12 36.8% 1,630 1 8
24 1980 5–8 38.5% 1,575 1 8
25 1981 4–9 30.8% 1,552 1 9
26 1982 3–6 33.3% 1,595 1 9
27 1983 5–15 25.0% 1,526 1 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chris Oneil Diane Morrison
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 2 1 3 66.7%
15 1974 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1972 3 0 3 100.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
17 1973 0 3 3 0.0%
18 1974 4 4 8 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
19 1975 18 5 23 78.3% 10 8 18 55.6%
20 1976 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1980 1 8 9 11.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 6 7 14.3%
22 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
24 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1981 0 5 5 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1983 2 6 8 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
Career 4 11 15 26.7% 33 37 70 47.1% 46 48 94 48.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 13 19 31.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 14 14 28 50.0% 2 7 9 22.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chris Oneil Diane Morrison
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1521 107.5 +81 57.1% +1.28 1–0 0–1 +0.85
15 1974 1504 99.5 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.26
16 1972 1548 107.2 +39 +1 57.9% +0.53 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 104.5 +1.29
17 1973 1503 96.5 -14 14.3% -2.00 0–1 0–2 +0.32
18 1974 1589 130.7 +28 -30 49.0% -0.18 2–5 (29%) 1–1 -0.21 1977 1508 111.9 60.0% +1.60 0–1 +0.04
19 1975 1661 134.9 +126 -23 61.8% +0.86 5–3 (63%) 7–1 (88%) 106.5 +3.59
20 1976 1691 124.2 +57 -6 68.2% +1.39 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.3 +2.35 1979 1676 136.8 -18 -22 -41 59.0% +1.03 3–2 (60%) 0–2 +1.94
21 1977 1638 111.9 +4 35.3% -0.53 1–2 (33%) 1–0 +0.42 1980 1594 117.4 -123 +90 31.9% -1.27 3–4 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 -0.03
22 1978 1716 126.6 -151 -47 +65 49.1% 0.00 4–3 (57%) 1–1 +1.21 1981 1636 124.3 +32 61.5% +0.95 2–2 (50%) 2–0 -0.38
23 1979 1631 118.0 -44 -33 +83 43.2% -0.55 3–5 (38%) 1–0 +1.29
24 1980 1576 99.2 -18 +119 37.9% -0.79 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 98.2 +0.16
25 1981 1552 111.1 -52 +127 39.3% -1.11 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) +0.74
26 1982 1596 132.3 -112 +127 38.1% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 100.0 -1.11
27 1983 1527 99.9 -38 -41 +147 27.3% -1.34 2–2 (50%) 0–5 (0%) 95.9 +0.78
Career 1766 128.0 -62 +33 +36 48.6% -0.06 25–30 (45%) 19–17 (53%) 100.0 +5.26 1694 129.4 -73 -22 +28 48.9% +0.14 9–10 (47%) 5–7 (42%) 96.9 +3.23

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.