H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Chris Oneil vs Heidi Eisterlehner H2H: 1-0
Chris Oneil holds a 1–0 lead over Heidi Eisterlehner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chris Oneil leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Chris Oneil won the 1978 New South Wales third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 1978* | New South Wales | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Chris Oneil | 6-2 6-4 | Heidi Eisterlehner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Oneil | — | — | — | 1,768 | 99 | 108 | 47.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| Heidi Eisterlehner | — | — | — | 1,774 | 112 | 127 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Chris Oneil | Heidi Eisterlehner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 14–6 | 70.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,636 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,714 | 1 | 8 | 1976 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 1979 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,632 | 1 | 8 | 1977 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 1980 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,577 | 1 | 8 | 1978 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 1981 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,555 | 1 | 9 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,598 | 1 | 9 | 1980 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 |
| 1983 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,528 | 1 | 9 | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |