H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Chris Oneil vs Helena Sukova H2H: 1-0

Chris Oneil holds a 1–0 lead over Helena Sukova in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Chris Oneil won the 1981 Brisbane International semifinal 7-6 4-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Oneil
AUS Age 70 Right-Handed
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Helena Sukova
CZE Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Oneil 7-6 4-6 7-6 Helena Sukova Match data Dec 12, 1981* SF Brisbane International WTA 500 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chris Oneil — — — 1,766 99 108 47.8% 1 0 0 2 6 9
Helena Sukova #102 #4 735 2,218 581 300 65.9% 0 0 0 3 6 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Oneil Helena Sukova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1972 6–3 66.7% — 1,547 0 2 1981 6–4 60.0% — 1,584 0 0
17 1973 0–3 0.0% — 1,502 0 2 1982 23–23 50.0% — 1,756 0 0
18 1974 10–12 45.5% — 1,588 0 2 1983 33–20 62.3% — 1,907 0 0
19 1975 30–17 63.8% — 1,661 0 4 1984 48–23 67.6% #7 2,041 0 1
20 1976 14–6 70.0% — 1,691 0 7 1985 54–21 72.0% #9 2,028 0 1
21 1977 2–5 28.6% — 1,638 0 7 1986 69–21 76.7% #5 2,151 0 3
22 1978 13–12 52.0% — 1,716 1 8 1987 58–19 75.3% #7 2,129 0 5
23 1979 7–12 36.8% — 1,630 1 8 1988 49–20 71.0% #8 2,098 0 5
24 1980 5–8 38.5% — 1,575 1 8 1989 39–15 72.2% #8 2,036 0 6
25 1981 4–9 30.8% — 1,552 1 9 1990 41–17 70.7% #14 2,024 0 6
26 1982 3–6 33.3% — 1,595 1 9 1991 34–18 65.4% #17 1,958 0 7
27 1983 5–15 25.0% — 1,526 1 9 1992 39–16 70.9% #12 1,965 0 9
28 — — — — — — — 1993 24–15 61.5% #17 1,922 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1994 21–14 60.0% #22 1,887 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 1995 18–15 54.5% #29 1,819 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1996 17–16 51.5% #35 1,776 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1997 8–21 27.6% #80 1,655 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1998 0–2 0.0% #102 1,632 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chris Oneil Helena Sukova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1972 — — — — 3 0 3 100.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1981 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
17 1973 — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1982 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 9 16 43.8%
18 1974 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 1983 8 4 12 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0%
19 1975 — — — — 18 5 23 78.3% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 1984 12 5 17 70.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 18 9 27 66.7%
20 1976 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 18 5 23 78.3% 13 6 19 68.4%
21 1977 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1986 23 5 28 82.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% 27 10 37 73.0%
22 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 20 6 26 76.9%
23 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1988 21 9 30 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 11 5 16 68.8%
24 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 26 6 32 81.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 1981 — — — — 0 5 5 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1990 17 7 24 70.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 12 6 18 66.7%
26 1982 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 16 6 22 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3%
27 1983 2 6 8 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1992 20 7 27 74.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 4 14 71.4%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 3 10 70.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 11 13 15.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 4 11 15 26.7% 33 37 70 47.1% 46 48 94 48.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — 213 105 318 67.0% 75 53 128 58.6% 125 49 174 71.8% 164 90 254 64.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chris Oneil Helena Sukova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1972 1548 107.2 — — — — — +39 +1 57.9% +0.53 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 104.5 +1.29 1981 1584 127.8 — — — — — — +54 59.1% +0.91 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.28
17 1973 1503 96.5 — — — — — — -14 14.3% -2.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.32 1982 1756 137.3 — — — — -64 -77 -97 48.2% -0.15 11–7 (61%) 4–7 (36%) 105.5 -2.58
18 1974 1589 130.7 — — — — — +28 -30 49.0% -0.18 2–5 (29%) 1–1 — -0.21 1983 1907 149.3 — — — — -85 -97 -127 59.7% +0.67 8–5 (62%) 6–8 (43%) 102.3 -2.48
19 1975 1661 134.9 — — — — — +126 -23 61.8% +0.86 5–3 (63%) 7–1 (88%) 106.5 +3.59 1984 2042 154.9 — — — — -99 -323 +10 60.7% +0.75 20–6 (77%) 9–10 (47%) 108.0 -2.37
20 1976 1691 124.2 — — — — — +57 -6 68.2% +1.39 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.3 +2.35 1985 2029 162.4 — — — — -21 -243 +104 68.7% +1.34 9–7 (56%) 9–7 (56%) 101.9 -3.44
21 1977 1638 111.9 — — — — — — +4 35.3% -0.53 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.42 1986 2152 173.6 — — — — +12 -258 +29 73.5% +1.77 11–9 (55%) 7–9 (44%) 97.5 -7.60
22 1978 1716 126.6 — — — — -151 -47 +65 49.1% 0.00 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — +1.21 1987 2130 164.9 — — — — +25 -243 +121 69.5% +1.40 17–7 (71%) 11–4 (73%) 105.2 -4.98
23 1979 1631 118.0 — — — — -44 -33 +83 43.2% -0.55 3–5 (38%) 1–0 — +1.29 1988 2099 164.2 — — — — +36 -123 +89 67.1% +1.03 10–4 (71%) 14–3 (82%) 109.5 -5.27
24 1980 1576 99.2 — — — — — -18 +119 37.9% -0.79 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 98.2 +0.16 1989 2037 158.2 — — — — +97 -141 +86 67.5% +1.04 9–3 (75%) 10–3 (77%) 106.3 -1.47
25 1981 1552 111.1 — — — — — -52 +127 39.3% -1.11 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.74 1990 2025 160.0 — — — — +46 -104 +169 64.7% +0.88 13–4 (76%) 7–2 (78%) 106.6 -0.53
26 1982 1596 132.3 — — — — — -112 +127 38.1% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 100.0 -1.11 1991 1958 153.8 — — — — +56 -26 +161 63.2% +1.02 9–6 (60%) 5–7 (42%) 95.3 +0.66
27 1983 1527 99.9 — — — — -38 -41 +147 27.3% -1.34 2–2 (50%) 0–5 (0%) 95.9 +0.78 1992 1966 153.3 — — — — +48 -64 +185 69.2% +1.42 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 96.8 +2.03
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1922 151.2 — — — — +11 — +198 60.2% +0.82 7–5 (58%) 4–6 (40%) 94.8 +0.04
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1887 144.4 — — — — +13 -45 +168 56.1% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 2–6 (25%) 97.3 +1.22
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1820 144.1 — — — — +24 +33 +207 53.9% +0.05 7–5 (58%) 9–2 (82%) 105.6 -0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1776 135.6 — — — — +9 -3 +295 50.6% +0.28 7–6 (54%) 4–4 (50%) 97.0 +0.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1655 126.9 — — — — -12 +65 +386 32.3% -1.05 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 92.0 -0.96
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1632 97.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.34 0–2 — — -0.23
Career — 1766 128.0 — — — — -62 +33 +36 48.6% -0.06 25–30 (45%) 19–17 (53%) 100.0 +5.26 — 2218 162.3 — — — — +10 -125 +96 62.6% +0.89 156–93 (63%) 105–89 (54%) 103.0 -3.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.