Chris Oneil
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Charles | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 21, 1976 | H2H |
| Dianne Fromholtz | 2 | 2 | 4 | Dec 14, 1978 | H2H |
| Patti Hogan | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 31, 1975 | H2H |
| Linda Mottram | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 10, 1975 | H2H |
| Betsy Nagelsen | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 21, 1983 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC
Chris Oneil vs Kim Sands H2H: 1-0
Chris Oneil holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chris Oneil leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Chris Oneil won the 1978 Adelaide International round of 16 5-7 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Oneil | 5-7 6-3 6-1 | Kim Sands | Match data | Dec 15, 1978* | R16 | Adelaide International | WTA 500 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Oneil | — | — | — | 1,766 | 99 | 108 | 47.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| Kim Sands | — | — | — | 1,713 | 53 | 123 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chris Oneil | Kim Sands | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1972 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1973 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1974 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1975 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 14–6 | 70.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,716 | 1 | 8 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1979 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,630 | 1 | 8 | 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1980 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,575 | 1 | 8 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1981 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,552 | 1 | 9 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1982 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,595 | 1 | 9 | 1983 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1983 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,526 | 1 | 9 | 1984 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Chris Oneil | Kim Sands | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1972 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 0 | 3 | 100.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1973 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1974 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1975 | — | — | — | — | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1978 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1978 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1979 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1979 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% |
| 24 | 1980 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1981 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% |
| 25 | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 26 | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1983 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 1983 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 33 | 37 | 70 | 47.1% | 46 | 48 | 94 | 48.9% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | 18 | 35 | 53 | 34.0% | 9 | 30 | 39 | 23.1% | 12 | 24 | 36 | 33.3% | 14 | 33 | 47 | 29.8% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Chris Oneil | Kim Sands | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1972 | 1548 | 107.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +39 | +1 | 57.9% | +0.53 | 2–1 (67%) | 3–0 (100%) | 104.5 | +1.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1973 | 1503 | 96.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | -14 | 14.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1974 | 1589 | 130.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +28 | -30 | 49.0% | -0.18 | 2–5 (29%) | 1–1 | — | -0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1975 | 1661 | 134.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +126 | -23 | 61.8% | +0.86 | 5–3 (63%) | 7–1 (88%) | 106.5 | +3.59 | 1976 | 1489 | 94.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | -0.17 |
| 20 | 1976 | 1691 | 124.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +57 | -6 | 68.2% | +1.39 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | 100.3 | +2.35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | 1638 | 111.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +4 | 35.3% | -0.53 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | +0.42 | 1978 | 1512 | 108.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +52 | 57.1% | +0.72 | 1–4 (20%) | 0–1 | — | +1.67 |
| 22 | 1978 | 1716 | 126.6 | — | — | — | — | -151 | -47 | +65 | 49.1% | 0.00 | 4–3 (57%) | 1–1 | — | +1.21 | 1979 | 1490 | 96.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.60 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.15 |
| 23 | 1979 | 1631 | 118.0 | — | — | — | — | -44 | -33 | +83 | 43.2% | -0.55 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–0 | — | +1.29 | 1980 | 1583 | 118.8 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -110 | -44 | 32.5% | -1.52 | 8–3 (73%) | 1–3 (25%) | 105.8 | -0.85 |
| 24 | 1980 | 1576 | 99.2 | — | — | — | — | — | -18 | +119 | 37.9% | -0.79 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–3 (0%) | 98.2 | +0.16 | 1981 | 1560 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | -8 | -100 | +50 | 35.7% | -1.06 | 3–7 (30%) | 1–1 | — | +0.95 |
| 25 | 1981 | 1552 | 111.1 | — | — | — | — | — | -52 | +127 | 39.3% | -1.11 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.74 | 1982 | 1503 | 104.0 | — | — | — | — | +5 | -143 | +77 | 23.3% | -1.88 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.7 | -0.85 |
| 26 | 1982 | 1596 | 132.3 | — | — | — | — | — | -112 | +127 | 38.1% | -0.76 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | 100.0 | -1.11 | 1983 | 1623 | 121.1 | — | — | — | — | -14 | -159 | -27 | 51.6% | 0.00 | 5–9 (36%) | 3–2 (60%) | 99.7 | +1.37 |
| 27 | 1983 | 1527 | 99.9 | — | — | — | — | -38 | -41 | +147 | 27.3% | -1.34 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–5 (0%) | 95.9 | +0.78 | 1984 | 1557 | 125.8 | — | — | — | — | +50 | -118 | -7 | 31.9% | -1.14 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–5 (29%) | 98.6 | -1.83 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1546 | 109.7 | — | — | — | — | +25 | -108 | — | 33.3% | -1.26 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–1 | — | +0.26 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1480 | 109.1 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 20.0% | -1.60 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–4 (0%) | 93.5 | +0.18 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1456 | 103.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.28 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.17 |
| Career | — | 1766 | 128.0 | — | — | — | — | -62 | +33 | +36 | 48.6% | -0.06 | 25–30 (45%) | 19–17 (53%) | 100.0 | +5.26 | — | 1714 | 119.0 | — | — | — | — | +12 | -124 | +20 | 34.9% | -1.08 | 23–37 (38%) | 10–19 (34%) | 92.4 | +0.40 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Kim Sands
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosalyn Fairbank | 0 | 7 | 7 | Aug 6, 1986 | H2H |
| Barbara Potter | 0 | 6 | 6 | Feb 2, 1984 | H2H |
| Candy Reynolds | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 27, 1986 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 0 | 4 | 4 | Sep 26, 1985 | H2H |
| Wendy White | 1 | 3 | 4 | Nov 11, 1983 | H2H |