H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Chris Oneil vs Linda Mottram H2H: 1-3
Linda Mottram holds a 3–1 lead over Chris Oneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Linda Mottram leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Linda Mottram won the 1975 Paddington semifinal 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 1975* | Paddington | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Linda Mottram | 7-5 6-3 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
| May 4, 1975* | Sutton | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Linda Mottram | 6-3 1-6 6-2 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
| Apr 27, 1975* | Norwich | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Chris Oneil | 6-4 6-7 6-4 | Linda Mottram | Match data |
| Apr 19, 1975* | Hampstead | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Linda Mottram | 7-5 6-2 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Oneil | — | — | — | 1,768 | 99 | 108 | 47.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| Linda Mottram | — | — | — | 1,867 | 99 | 49 | 66.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Chris Oneil | Linda Mottram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 6–1 | 85.7% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 1974 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 1975 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 32–8 | 80.0% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 4 |
| 1976 | 14–6 | 70.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 21–7 | 75.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 8 |
| 1977 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,636 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 9 |
| 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,714 | 1 | 8 | 1978 | 19–7 | 73.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 11 |
| 1979 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,632 | 1 | 8 | 1979 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 11 |
| 1980 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,577 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,555 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,598 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,528 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |