H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Chris Oneil vs Sabina Simmonds H2H: 2-0
Chris Oneil holds a 2–0 lead over Sabina Simmonds in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chris Oneil leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Chris Oneil won the 1980 Chichester second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 1980* | Chichester | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Chris Oneil | 6-1 6-3 | Sabina Simmonds | Match data |
| Apr 16, 1975* | Hampstead | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Chris Oneil | 7-5 6-0 | Sabina Simmonds | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Oneil | — | — | — | 1,768 | 99 | 108 | 47.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| Sabina Simmonds | — | — | — | 1,830 | 108 | 122 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Chris Oneil | Sabina Simmonds | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 14–6 | 70.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,636 | 0 | 7 | 1979 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 2 |
| 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,714 | 1 | 8 | 1980 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 1979 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,632 | 1 | 8 | 1981 | 21–10 | 67.7% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 5 |
| 1980 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,577 | 1 | 8 | 1982 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 5 |
| 1981 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,555 | 1 | 9 | 1983 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 6 |
| 1982 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,598 | 1 | 9 | 1984 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 6 |
| 1983 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,528 | 1 | 9 | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 6 |