H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Chris Oneil vs Sue Barker H2H: 0-3
Sue Barker holds a 3–0 lead over Chris Oneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sue Barker leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sue Barker won the 1982 Monte Carlo third round 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 1982* | Monte Carlo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Sue Barker | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
| Dec 7, 1979* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Sue Barker | 6-3 6-2 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
| Nov 27, 1978* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | F | — | Sue Barker | 6-1 6-3 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Oneil | — | — | — | 1,768 | 99 | 108 | 47.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Chris Oneil | Sue Barker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 1976 | 14–6 | 70.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 |
| 1977 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,636 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 |
| 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,714 | 1 | 8 | 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 |
| 1979 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,632 | 1 | 8 | 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 |
| 1980 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,577 | 1 | 8 | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 |
| 1981 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,555 | 1 | 9 | 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 |
| 1982 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,598 | 1 | 9 | 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 |
| 1983 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,528 | 1 | 9 | 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 |