H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Chris Oneil vs Sue Barker H2H: 0-3

Sue Barker holds a 3–0 lead over Chris Oneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sue Barker leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sue Barker won the 1982 Monte Carlo round of 32 3-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Oneil
AUS Age 70 Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Sue Barker
GBR Age 70 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sue Barker 3-6 6-3 6-4 Chris Oneil Match data Jul 15, 1982* R32 Monte Carlo WTA 250 Clay
Sue Barker 6-3 6-2 Chris Oneil Match data Dec 7, 1979* R16 Sydney WTA 500 Grass
Sue Barker 6-1 6-3 Chris Oneil Match data Nov 27, 1978* F Brisbane International WTA 500 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chris Oneil — — — 1,766 99 108 47.8% 1 0 0 2 6 9
Sue Barker #162 #5 — 2,262 381 217 63.7% 1 0 0 3 18 22

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Oneil Sue Barker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1970 1–1 50.0% — 1,513 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,526 0 0
16 1972 6–3 66.7% — 1,547 0 2 1972 3–2 60.0% — 1,542 0 0
17 1973 0–3 0.0% — 1,502 0 2 1973 8–6 57.1% — 1,569 0 1
18 1974 10–12 45.5% — 1,588 0 2 1974 40–20 66.7% — 1,764 0 6
19 1975 30–17 63.8% — 1,661 0 4 1975 50–19 72.5% — 1,969 0 11
20 1976 14–6 70.0% — 1,691 0 7 1976 64–23 73.6% #10 2,065 1 14
21 1977 2–5 28.6% — 1,638 0 7 1977 51–18 73.9% #5 2,142 1 16
22 1978 13–12 52.0% — 1,716 1 8 1978 16–14 53.3% — 1,936 1 17
23 1979 7–12 36.8% — 1,630 1 8 1979 54–24 69.2% #10 2,022 1 20
24 1980 5–8 38.5% — 1,575 1 8 1980 34–18 65.4% — 1,930 1 20
25 1981 4–9 30.8% — 1,552 1 9 1981 28–18 60.9% — 1,958 1 21
26 1982 3–6 33.3% — 1,595 1 9 1982 11–19 36.7% — 1,804 1 21
27 1983 5–15 25.0% — 1,526 1 9 1983 18–20 47.4% — 1,750 1 22
28 — — — — — — — 1984 2–14 12.5% #57 1,555 1 22

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chris Oneil Sue Barker
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
16 1972 — — — — 3 0 3 100.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1972 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1973 — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1974 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 1974 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 19 9 28 67.9% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 1975 — — — — 18 5 23 78.3% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 18 6 24 75.0% 21 6 27 77.8% 7 4 11 63.6%
20 1976 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1976 2 2 4 50.0% 25 5 30 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 21 11 32 65.6%
21 1977 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1977 5 6 11 45.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 14 5 19 73.7% 30 6 36 83.3%
22 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9%
23 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1979 12 6 18 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 15 10 25 60.0%
24 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 14 8 22 63.6%
25 1981 — — — — 0 5 5 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1981 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 9 6 15 60.0%
26 1982 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3%
27 1983 2 6 8 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 6 9 33.3%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 4 11 15 26.7% 33 37 70 47.1% 46 48 94 48.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — 42 39 81 51.9% 70 36 106 66.0% 133 64 197 67.5% 113 75 188 60.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chris Oneil Sue Barker
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1514 108.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.03
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1526 105.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.11
16 1972 1548 107.2 — — — — — +39 +1 57.9% +0.53 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 104.5 +1.29 1972 1542 113.2 — — — — — — +27 63.6% +1.00 0–1 1–0 — +1.44
17 1973 1503 96.5 — — — — — — -14 14.3% -2.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.32 1973 1569 110.1 — — — — — -23 -31 58.6% +0.65 0–3 (0%) — — +1.95
18 1974 1589 130.7 — — — — — +28 -30 49.0% -0.18 2–5 (29%) 1–1 — -0.21 1974 1765 135.9 — — — — -151 -87 -21 63.0% +1.02 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 105.3 +3.79
19 1975 1661 134.9 — — — — — +126 -23 61.8% +0.86 5–3 (63%) 7–1 (88%) 106.5 +3.59 1975 1970 154.9 — — — — -139 -87 -18 71.3% +1.42 7–4 (64%) 7–1 (88%) 107.6 -2.41
20 1976 1691 124.2 — — — — — +57 -6 68.2% +1.39 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.3 +2.35 1976 2065 160.2 — — — — -34 -14 -12 68.2% +1.32 17–7 (71%) 6–6 (50%) 110.0 -4.93
21 1977 1638 111.9 — — — — — — +4 35.3% -0.53 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.42 1977 2143 167.0 — — — — +151 -94 -79 72.9% +1.56 10–4 (71%) 11–3 (79%) 108.3 -7.72
22 1978 1716 126.6 — — — — -151 -47 +65 49.1% 0.00 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — +1.21 1978 1937 142.1 — — — — +44 — +82 57.6% +0.97 1–4 (20%) 3–7 (30%) 90.7 -1.00
23 1979 1631 118.0 — — — — -44 -33 +83 43.2% -0.55 3–5 (38%) 1–0 — +1.29 1979 2022 162.5 — — — — +44 -17 +25 66.3% +1.16 9–13 (41%) 8–5 (62%) 92.1 -4.06
24 1980 1576 99.2 — — — — — -18 +119 37.9% -0.79 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 98.2 +0.16 1980 1930 145.7 — — — — +28 — +103 63.8% +1.04 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 96.5 +0.09
25 1981 1552 111.1 — — — — — -52 +127 39.3% -1.11 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.74 1981 1958 149.2 — — — — +21 -1 +64 57.1% +0.36 14–8 (64%) 10–2 (83%) 109.0 -3.65
26 1982 1596 132.3 — — — — — -112 +127 38.1% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 100.0 -1.11 1982 1804 134.1 — — — — +60 +89 +86 37.7% -0.84 5–4 (56%) 0–1 — -3.09
27 1983 1527 99.9 — — — — -38 -41 +147 27.3% -1.34 2–2 (50%) 0–5 (0%) 95.9 +0.78 1983 1751 132.8 — — — — +74 +55 +125 48.9% -0.30 5–7 (42%) 7–2 (78%) 99.3 +0.35
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1555 94.1 — — — — +107 +140 +248 12.5% -2.37 2–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.91
Career — 1766 128.0 — — — — -62 +33 +36 48.6% -0.06 25–30 (45%) 19–17 (53%) 100.0 +5.26 — 2263 155.4 — — — — +36 -26 +24 61.8% +0.84 83–65 (56%) 63–37 (63%) 106.4 -3.08

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.