H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Christina Mchale vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 2-2
Christina Mchale and Tamira Paszek are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Christina Mchale leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Christina Mchale won the 2013 Quebec City third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2013* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Christina Mchale | 6-2 6-1 | Tamira Paszek | Match data |
| Sep 28, 2011* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Christina Mchale | 7-6(1) 6-3 | Tamira Paszek | Match data |
| Jun 24, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Tamira Paszek | 6-4 6-1 | Christina Mchale | Match data |
| Sep 18, 2010* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Tamira Paszek | 6-2 6-2 | Christina Mchale | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christina Mchale | #319 | #24 | 1,935 | 1,803 | 166 | 207 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tamira Paszek | — | — | — | 1,801 | 99 | 128 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christina Mchale | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #231 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2010 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #43 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2012 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #33 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2013 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #66 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2014 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #52 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2016 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2017 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #151 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 2–16 | 11.1% | #159 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |