H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Christina Sandberg vs Daniela Marzano H2H: 2-0
Christina Sandberg holds a 2–0 lead over Daniela Marzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Christina Sandberg leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Christina Sandberg won the 1974 Rome second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 78
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1974* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Christina Sandberg | 6-2 6-3 | Daniela Marzano | Match data |
| Apr 5, 1970* | Catania | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Christina Sandberg | 6-0 6-1 | Daniela Marzano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christina Sandberg | — | — | — | 1,838 | 130 | 90 | 59.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Daniela Marzano | — | — | — | 1,599 | 37 | 70 | 34.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christina Sandberg | Daniela Marzano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,374 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1968 | 22–15 | 59.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1969 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 7–11 | 38.9% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1970 | 27–13 | 67.5% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1971 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1972 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1973 | 16–9 | 64.0% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 8 | 1975 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1974 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1975 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 8 | 1978 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |