H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Christina Sandberg vs Ingrid Bentzer H2H: 2-1
Christina Sandberg holds a 2–1 lead over Ingrid Bentzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Christina Sandberg leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ingrid Bentzer won the 1972 Bastad final 1-6 6-3 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 78
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 82
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 1972* | Bastad | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Ingrid Bentzer | 1-6 6-3 8-6 | Christina Sandberg | Match data |
| Feb 2, 1972* | Umea | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Christina Sandberg | 6-4 6-4 | Ingrid Bentzer | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1970* | Stockholm | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Christina Sandberg | 1-6 9-7 6-1 | Ingrid Bentzer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christina Sandberg | — | — | — | 1,838 | 130 | 90 | 59.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Ingrid Bentzer | — | — | — | 1,826 | 72 | 99 | 42.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christina Sandberg | Ingrid Bentzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1968 | 22–15 | 59.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1969 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1970 | 27–13 | 67.5% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1971 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1972 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 7 | 1968 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1973 | 16–9 | 64.0% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 8 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1974 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 8 | 1970 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1975 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 8 | 1971 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 8 | 1972 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 16–8 | 66.7% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 7 |