H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Christina Sandberg vs Maria Teresa Nasuelli H2H: 2-1
Christina Sandberg holds a 2–1 lead over Maria Teresa Nasuelli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Christina Sandberg leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Maria Teresa Nasuelli won the 1971 Beaulieu fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 78
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 1971* | Beaulieu | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Maria Teresa Nasuelli | 6-1 6-1 | Christina Sandberg | Match data |
| Sep 6, 1968* | Ortisei | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Christina Sandberg | 4-6 8-6 6-4 | Maria Teresa Nasuelli | Match data |
| May 3, 1968* | Reggio Calabria | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Christina Sandberg | 6-2 6-0 | Maria Teresa Nasuelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christina Sandberg | — | — | — | 1,838 | 130 | 90 | 59.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Maria Teresa Nasuelli | — | — | — | 1,622 | 66 | 98 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Christina Sandberg | Maria Teresa Nasuelli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 22–15 | 59.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 2 |
| 1970 | 27–13 | 67.5% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 2 |
| 1971 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 2 |
| 1972 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 7 | 1972 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 3 |
| 1973 | 16–9 | 64.0% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 8 | 1973 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 3 |
| 1974 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 8 | 1974 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 3 |
| 1975 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 8 | 1975 | 7–11 | 38.9% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 3 |
| 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 3 |