H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Christina Sandberg vs Nancy Richey H2H: 0-3
Nancy Richey holds a 3–0 lead over Christina Sandberg in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nancy Richey leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nancy Richey won the 1972 Wimbledon second round 5-7 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 78
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 83
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 1972* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Nancy Richey | 5-7 6-1 6-2 | Christina Sandberg | Match data |
| May 30, 1968* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Nancy Richey | 6-2 6-1 | Christina Sandberg | Match data |
| Apr 5, 1968* | San Juan | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Nancy Richey | 6-0 6-1 | Christina Sandberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christina Sandberg | — | — | — | 1,838 | 130 | 90 | 59.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Nancy Richey | — | — | — | 2,236 | 324 | 109 | 74.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 24 | 28 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christina Sandberg | Nancy Richey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1968 | 22–15 | 59.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1969 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1970 | 27–13 | 67.5% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1971 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1972 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1973 | 16–9 | 64.0% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 8 | 1968 | 56–5 | 91.8% | — | 1,887 | 1 | 10 |
| 26 | 1974 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 8 | 1969 | 33–8 | 80.5% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 13 |
| 27 | 1975 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 8 | 1970 | 43–8 | 84.3% | — | 2,114 | 1 | 20 |
| 28 | 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 8 | 1971 | 29–13 | 69.0% | — | 2,078 | 1 | 20 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 2,128 | 1 | 25 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 34–13 | 72.3% | — | 2,162 | 1 | 25 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 25 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 26 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 2,034 | 1 | 26 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,983 | 1 | 28 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,902 | 1 | 28 |