H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Christina Sandberg vs Pam Teeguarden H2H: 1-1

Christina Sandberg and Pam Teeguarden are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Pam Teeguarden won the 1972 US Open round of 64 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Christina Sandberg
SWE Age 78 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Teeguarden 6-2 6-4 Christina Sandberg Match data Sep 2, 1972* R64 US Open Grand Slam Grass
Christina Sandberg 8-6 6-3 Pam Teeguarden Match data Jun 4, 1971* R16 Manchester WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Christina Sandberg — — — 1,839 130 90 59.1% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Christina Sandberg Pam Teeguarden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1
20 1968 22–15 59.5% — 1,631 0 1 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1
21 1969 27–17 61.4% — 1,714 0 3 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1
22 1970 27–13 67.5% — 1,812 0 6 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1
23 1971 23–16 59.0% — 1,802 0 6 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3
24 1972 7–8 46.7% — 1,719 0 7 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3
25 1973 16–9 64.0% — 1,737 0 8 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3
26 1974 5–6 45.5% — 1,698 0 8 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,762 0 3
27 1975 1–2 33.3% — 1,682 0 8 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,723 0 3
28 1976 2–4 33.3% — 1,665 0 8 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,746 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,802 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,789 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,682 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,651 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,587 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Christina Sandberg Pam Teeguarden
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1968 2 2 4 50.0% 18 10 28 64.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1969 0 1 1 0.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0%
22 1970 — — — — 12 4 16 75.0% 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 1971 — — — — 14 9 23 60.9% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
24 1972 — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 0 2 100.0% 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1%
25 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
26 1974 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
27 1975 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
28 1976 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 3 4 7 42.9% 79 52 131 60.3% 39 32 71 54.9% 9 2 11 81.8% — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Christina Sandberg Pam Teeguarden
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45
20 1968 1631 118.4 — — — — -126 +49 -93 60.0% +0.93 4–7 (36%) — — -0.11 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97
21 1969 1714 125.2 — — — — -15 +14 -105 55.6% +0.27 10–3 (77%) — — -1.41 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.18
22 1970 1812 139.6 — — — — — +1 -24 63.5% +1.00 5–2 (71%) — — +0.18 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05
23 1971 1803 137.7 — — — — — +11 +6 59.1% +0.73 4–8 (33%) — — -0.53 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -4.34
24 1972 1720 113.5 — — — — — -3 +45 48.5% -0.33 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — +0.89 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08
25 1973 1737 130.3 — — — — — +4 +48 62.1% +0.76 4–4 (50%) 2–0 — +0.91 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.53
26 1974 1698 117.8 — — — — — +53 +26 43.5% -0.09 1–0 — — -0.60 1977 1763 141.5 — — — — -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44
27 1975 1683 107.0 — — — — — +54 — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.15 1978 1724 122.7 — — — — -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11
28 1976 1666 112.2 — — — — — +83 +11 30.8% -1.15 1–0 0–1 — -0.53 1979 1746 144.0 — — — — -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1802 134.4 — — — — -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1789 134.6 — — — — -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1683 118.4 — — — — -148 — +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.19
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1652 106.0 — — — — -83 +79 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1615 107.2 — — — — -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1588 113.3 — — — — -40 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.53
Career — 1840 133.7 — — — — -58 +22 -18 57.1% +0.54 30–28 (52%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 -0.49 — 1923 143.0 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.