H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Christina Sandberg vs Patti Hogan H2H: 2-2
Christina Sandberg and Patti Hogan are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Patti Hogan leads 2–1 on grass, while Christina Sandberg leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Christina Sandberg won the 1971 US Open second round 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 78
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 76
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 1971* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Christina Sandberg | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Patti Hogan | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1970* | Queen's Club | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Patti Hogan | 7-5 4-6 6-0 | Christina Sandberg | Match data |
| Apr 10, 1969* | Charlotte | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Christina Sandberg | 7-5 4-6 7-5 | Patti Hogan | Match data |
| Jun 30, 1968* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Patti Hogan | 6-4 6-4 | Christina Sandberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christina Sandberg | — | — | — | 1,838 | 130 | 90 | 59.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Patti Hogan | — | — | — | 2,010 | 280 | 186 | 60.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christina Sandberg | Patti Hogan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 32–17 | 65.3% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 42–24 | 63.6% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1968 | 22–15 | 59.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 55–30 | 64.7% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1969 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 41–29 | 58.6% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1970 | 27–13 | 67.5% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 25–18 | 58.1% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1971 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1972 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1973 | 16–9 | 64.0% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 8 | 1975 | 24–18 | 57.1% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1974 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1975 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 8 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 7 |