H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Christina Singer vs Ann Grossman H2H: 0-2

Ann Grossman holds a 2–0 lead over Christina Singer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ann Grossman leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1994 US Open round of 128 6-3 6-4.

GER Age 58 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 2
2 main-draw meetings
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ann Grossman #36 6-3 6-4 Christina Singer #74 Match data Aug 31, 1994* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Ann Grossman #30 7-6 6-3 Christina Singer #117 Match data Aug 4, 1993* R32 San Diego Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Christina Singer #892 #41 163 1,738 56 86 39.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,887 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Christina Singer Ann Grossman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0
17 1986 1–1 50.0% #163 1,506 0 0 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0
18 1987 7–8 46.7% #85 1,557 0 0 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0
19 1988 4–12 25.0% #160 1,487 0 0 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,748 0 0
20 1989 1–4 20.0% #264 1,448 0 0 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,638 0 0
21 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,733 0 0
22 1991 0–1 0.0% #199 1,434 0 0 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,804 0 0
23 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0
24 1993 10–13 43.5% #80 1,564 0 0 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0
25 1994 10–15 40.0% #77 1,615 0 0 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,665 0 0
26 1995 17–16 51.5% #54 1,708 0 0 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0
27 1996 6–15 28.6% #136 1,581 0 0 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0
28 1997 0–1 0.0% #504 1,568 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Christina Singer Ann Grossman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1986 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 13 11 24 54.2% 2 1 3 66.7%
18 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1989 16 11 27 59.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1988 1 6 7 14.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 9 12 21 42.9% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1989 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1992 15 8 23 65.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1994 16 10 26 61.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1993 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1995 5 10 15 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1994 6 7 13 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1997 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1996 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1997 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 24 37 61 39.3% 7 24 31 22.6% 16 13 29 55.2% 9 12 21 42.9% 111 106 217 51.2% 59 56 115 51.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 11 14 25 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Christina Singer Ann Grossman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1497 101.9 0.0% -4.00 -0.15
17 1986 1507 99.7 40.0% -1.20 1–0 +0.24 1988 1699 133.9 +28 54.1% +0.13 4–3 (57%) 0–5 (0%) 100.1 +0.16
18 1987 1558 114.7 +60 -20 42.4% -0.33 3–0 (100%) 2–3 (40%) 104.0 +1.17 1989 1737 136.2 +43 -89 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 4–5 (44%) 101.2 -1.22
19 1988 1488 107.6 +35 0 +99 28.6% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 0–2 +1.48 1990 1749 136.3 -12 +8 51.0% +0.02 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) -1.48
20 1989 1449 92.5 -4 18.2% -2.36 1–0 0–1 +0.84 1991 1638 126.7 -16 +89 44.3% +0.06 3–7 (30%) 2–6 (25%) 91.9 +0.49
21 1992 1733 132.9 +24 -9 52.9% -0.03 6–3 (67%) 6–1 (86%) 108.7 +1.73
22 1991 1435 95.3 0.0% -3.00 +0.15 1993 1805 140.5 +9 -60 59.6% +0.62 6–7 (46%) 6–3 (67%) 103.6 +0.77
23 1994 1853 146.2 0 -73 -249 53.6% -0.01 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 107.3 -1.02
24 1993 1564 129.1 +59 -131 44.0% -0.56 2–2 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 103.0 +0.51 1995 1681 123.7 +38 +44 40.8% -0.46 4–5 (44%) 3–9 (25%) 92.7 +0.33
25 1994 1616 129.7 +55 -196 -15 40.0% -0.82 6–4 (60%) 0–2 +0.29 1996 1666 130.2 +49 +8 42.9% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 0–2 -0.99
26 1995 1709 128.0 -57 -277 +23 50.0% -0.33 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 104.9 -0.60 1997 1615 123.7 +26 +98 38.6% -1.25 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.1 -0.41
27 1996 1582 110.5 -22 +191 34.0% -1.20 3–5 (38%) 1–0 +0.09 1998 1595 103.2 +41 +76 33.3% -1.58 1–0 +0.11
28 1997 1568 100.8 0.0% -2.50 0–1 +0.14
Career 1738 124.4 +15 -81 +66 39.7% -0.82 21–15 (58%) 11–12 (48%) 105.4 +3.04 1888 140.3 +18 +6 -249 49.9% -0.10 53–53 (50%) 31–39 (44%) 99.5 -0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.