Christina Singer
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irina Spirlea | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 23, 1996 | H2H |
| Petra Begerow | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 7, 1996 | H2H |
| Rika Hiraki | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 26, 1996 | H2H |
| Miriam Oremans | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 15, 1996 | H2H |
| Rennae Stubbs | 2 | 0 | 2 | Jun 12, 1996 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik holds a 1–0 lead over Christina Singer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Strandlund Tomsvik leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maria Strandlund Tomsvik won the 1988 Roland Garros round of 128 1-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | 1-6 6-2 6-2 | Christina Singer | Match data | May 25, 1988* | R128 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christina Singer | #892 | #41 | 163 | 1,738 | 56 | 86 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | — | — | — | 1,625 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Christina Singer | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #264 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #80 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #77 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #136 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #504 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Christina Singer | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1986 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1988 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1988 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 1989 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1991 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1993 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1993 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1996 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1995 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1997 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | 24 | 37 | 61 | 39.3% | 7 | 24 | 31 | 22.6% | 16 | 13 | 29 | 55.2% | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | Career | 19 | 28 | 47 | 40.4% | 14 | 30 | 44 | 31.8% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Christina Singer | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1986 | 1507 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.20 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.24 | 1987 | 1504 | 102.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.0% | +1.20 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.37 |
| 1987 | 1558 | 114.7 | — | — | — | — | +60 | -20 | — | 42.4% | -0.33 | 3–0 (100%) | 2–3 (40%) | 104.0 | +1.17 | 1988 | 1578 | 125.8 | — | — | — | — | +10 | -8 | — | 45.5% | -0.15 | 4–3 (57%) | 1–2 (33%) | 102.9 | +0.45 |
| 1988 | 1488 | 107.6 | — | — | — | — | +35 | 0 | +99 | 28.6% | -1.37 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | +1.48 | 1989 | 1612 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -33 | — | 44.3% | -0.85 | 6–7 (46%) | 1–1 | — | +0.30 |
| 1989 | 1449 | 92.5 | — | — | — | — | — | -4 | — | 18.2% | -2.36 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.84 | 1990 | 1589 | 112.6 | — | — | — | — | +13 | -55 | — | 32.7% | -1.00 | 5–3 (63%) | 0–5 (0%) | 99.0 | -0.92 |
| 1991 | 1435 | 95.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.15 | 1991 | 1554 | 113.6 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -34 | +68 | 35.7% | -0.98 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | 99.8 | -0.11 |
| 1993 | 1564 | 129.1 | — | — | — | — | +59 | -131 | — | 44.0% | -0.56 | 2–2 (50%) | 5–2 (71%) | 103.0 | +0.51 | 1992 | 1520 | 104.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.57 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.32 |
| 1994 | 1616 | 129.7 | — | — | — | — | +55 | -196 | -15 | 40.0% | -0.82 | 6–4 (60%) | 0–2 | — | +0.29 | 1993 | 1560 | 135.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.42 | 2–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.82 |
| 1995 | 1709 | 128.0 | — | — | — | — | -57 | -277 | +23 | 50.0% | -0.33 | 4–2 (67%) | 3–1 (75%) | 104.9 | -0.60 | 1994 | 1546 | 102.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.25 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.30 |
| 1996 | 1582 | 110.5 | — | — | — | — | -22 | — | +191 | 34.0% | -1.20 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–0 | — | +0.09 | 1995 | 1545 | 114.4 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -11 | +27 | 40.8% | -0.86 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–1 | — | -0.97 |
| 1997 | 1568 | 100.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.14 | 1996 | 1527 | 113.8 | — | — | — | — | +25 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.60 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.67 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1515 | 100.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.13 |
| Career | 1738 | 124.4 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -81 | +66 | 39.7% | -0.82 | 21–15 (58%) | 11–12 (48%) | 105.4 | +3.04 | Career | 1625 | 123.4 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -29 | +45 | 38.2% | -0.87 | 23–24 (49%) | 6–16 (27%) | 97.8 | -1.28 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irina Spirlea | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 23, 1996 | H2H |
| Petra Begerow | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 7, 1996 | H2H |
| Rika Hiraki | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 26, 1996 | H2H |
| Miriam Oremans | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 15, 1996 | H2H |
| Rennae Stubbs | 2 | 0 | 2 | Jun 12, 1996 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lori Mcneil | 1 | 3 | 4 | Nov 2, 1995 | H2H |
| Silke Meier | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 28, 1995 | H2H |
| Monica Seles | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 29, 1993 | H2H |
| Emanuela Zardo | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 20, 1993 | H2H |
| Laurence Courtois | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 13, 1996 | H2H |