H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Claudia Casabianca vs Andrea Tiezzi H2H: 1-0

Claudia Casabianca holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Tiezzi in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Claudia Casabianca won the 1981 Porto Alegre round of 16 6-2 6-1.

H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Claudia Casabianca 6-2 6-1 Andrea Tiezzi Match data Apr 10, 1981* R16 Porto Alegre WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Claudia Casabianca — — — 1,671 28 26 51.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Andrea Tiezzi — — — 1,586 21 28 42.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Casabianca Andrea Tiezzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1975 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 1980 4–2 66.7% — 1,531 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 3–5 37.5% — 1,503 0 0
17 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,475 0 0 1982 8–7 53.3% — 1,547 0 0
18 1978 0–6 0.0% — 1,443 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,550 0 0
19 1979 1–1 50.0% — 1,453 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1980 20–11 64.5% — 1,621 0 2 1985 2–1 66.7% — 1,558 0 0
21 1981 7–6 53.8% — 1,640 0 2 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,523 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1987 1–1 50.0% — 1,522 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1988 0–4 0.0% — 1,462 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1989 2–1 66.7% — 1,489 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1990 0–4 0.0% — 1,454 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Claudia Casabianca Andrea Tiezzi
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1975 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1980 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
17 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1982 — — — — 8 7 15 53.3% — — — —
18 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
Career — 1 4 5 20.0% 9 10 19 47.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — 2 3 5 40.0% 14 19 33 42.4% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Claudia Casabianca Andrea Tiezzi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1975 1482 97.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.30 1980 1532 107.4 — — — — — +29 — 58.3% +0.08 1–1 — — +0.69
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1504 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.81 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — -0.07
17 1977 1476 103.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.01 1982 1547 114.1 — — — — — +43 — 53.1% +0.22 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.95
18 1978 1444 113.4 — — — — — +16 — 14.3% -2.22 0–2 0–1 — -0.70 1983 1551 103.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.25 — 0–1 — +0.46
19 1979 1453 101.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.67 1–1 — — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 1621 134.7 — — — — -67 -65 — 61.8% +1.16 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.8 -0.02 1985 1559 102.3 — — — — — — — 57.1% +0.57 1–0 1–0 — +0.08
21 1981 1641 130.3 — — — — — — — 57.7% +0.88 1–1 0–1 — -0.47 1986 1523 92.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.21
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1522 99.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — +0.27
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1463 91.0 — — — — — — — 11.1% -2.22 0–1 0–1 — +0.61
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1490 99.0 — — — — +40 — — 57.1% 0.00 1–0 — — +0.48
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1454 99.6 — — — — — +3 — 0.0% -3.13 — 0–1 — -0.33
Career — 1671 131.8 — — — — -67 -50 — 53.3% +0.54 6–10 (38%) 3–3 (50%) 98.5 -1.23 — 1586 104.3 — — — — +40 +33 — 42.2% -0.60 7–6 (54%) 3–5 (38%) 98.2 +6.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.