H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Andrea Jaeger H2H: 0-4

Andrea Jaeger holds a 4–0 lead over Claudia Kohde Kilsch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrea Jaeger leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1983 Eastbourne fourth round 7-5 6-4.

Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 4
4 main draw meetings
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 17, 1983* Eastbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Andrea Jaeger 7-5 6-4 Claudia Kohde Kilsch Match data
May 21, 1983* Berlin WTA 500 QF Clay Andrea Jaeger 6-2 7-5 Claudia Kohde Kilsch Match data
Feb 27, 1982* Oakland WTA 250 SF Carpet Andrea Jaeger 3-6 6-3 6-2 Claudia Kohde Kilsch Match data
Nov 6, 1980* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Carpet Andrea Jaeger 4-6 6-3 6-3 Claudia Kohde Kilsch Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Andrea Jaeger #225 #3 2,280 257 90 74.1% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Andrea Jaeger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1977 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0
14 1979 2–2 50.0% 1,522 0 1
15 1979 0–1 0.0% 1,480 0 0 1980 62–18 77.5% 2,169 0 4
16 1980 36–18 66.7% 1,755 0 1 1981 61–18 77.2% 2,179 0 7
17 1981 40–22 64.5% 1,841 0 5 1982 65–20 76.5% 2,170 0 9
18 1982 34–23 59.6% 1,914 0 8 1983 50–18 73.5% 2,091 0 10
19 1983 29–20 59.2% 1,871 0 8 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,015 0 10
20 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9 1985 5–5 50.0% 1,932 0 10
21 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10 1986 0–1 0.0% #225 1,907 0 10
22 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10 1987 3–2 60.0% 1,882 0 10
23 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10
24 1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11
25 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11
26 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12
27 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12
28 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12