H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Candy Reynolds H2H: 1-3
Candy Reynolds holds a 3–1 lead over Claudia Kohde Kilsch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Candy Reynolds leads 1–0 on carpet, while Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1984 Hilton Head second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 62
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 71
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 1984* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 6-4 6-2 | Candy Reynolds | Match data |
| Aug 25, 1983* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Candy Reynolds | 6-7 6-4 7-6 | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Match data |
| Oct 28, 1982* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Candy Reynolds | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Match data |
| Dec 4, 1981* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Candy Reynolds | 6-1 6-2 | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | #387 | #4 | 77 | 2,157 | 401 | 233 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
| Candy Reynolds | #485 | #76 | 5 | 1,859 | 84 | 140 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Candy Reynolds | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1980 | 36–18 | 66.7% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,914 | 0 | 8 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 8 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #8 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 1975 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #5 | 2,115 | 0 | 10 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 10 | 1977 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,419 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #10 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | 1978 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,952 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 11 | 1980 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #46 | 1,792 | 0 | 12 | 1981 | 19–17 | 52.8% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #85 | 1,682 | 0 | 12 | 1982 | 17–22 | 43.6% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #78 | 1,647 | 0 | 12 | 1983 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #177 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #251 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #485 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |