H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Catherine Tanvier H2H: 3-1

Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 3–1 lead over Catherine Tanvier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on carpet, while Catherine Tanvier leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1986 US Open round of 64 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Claudia Kohde Kilsch
GER Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Catherine Tanvier
FRA Age 61 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #6 6-1 6-0 Catherine Tanvier #68 Match data Aug 29, 1986* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Catherine Tanvier #23 7-5 6-3 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #18 Match data Apr 20, 1984* R16 Amelia Island Category 4 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Claudia Kohde Kilsch 6-3 6-7 6-4 Catherine Tanvier Match data Feb 25, 1983* R16 Oakland WTA 250 Carpet
Claudia Kohde Kilsch 6-3 6-2 Catherine Tanvier Match data Jul 10, 1982* SF Gstaad WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,158 401 234 63.1% 0 0 0 3 9 12
Catherine Tanvier #752 #20 22 1,879 161 179 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Catherine Tanvier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1980 4–2 66.7% — 1,545 0 0
16 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,754 0 1 1981 6–14 30.0% — 1,540 0 0
17 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,838 0 5 1982 23–19 54.8% — 1,800 0 0
18 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,909 0 8 1983 17–16 51.5% — 1,826 0 0
19 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8 1984 21–18 53.8% #30 1,777 0 0
20 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,019 0 9 1985 18–16 52.9% #39 1,775 0 0
21 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,117 0 10 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,826 0 0
22 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,051 0 10 1987 10–19 34.5% #96 1,618 0 0
23 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 2,019 0 10 1988 9–16 36.0% #77 1,603 0 0
24 1988 39–19 67.2% #12 1,944 0 11 1989 12–12 50.0% #65 1,673 0 0
25 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,852 0 11 1990 9–11 45.0% #99 1,657 0 0
26 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,791 0 12 1991 7–10 41.2% #104 1,603 0 0
27 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,681 0 12 1992 6–7 46.2% #105 1,613 0 0
28 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,646 0 12 1993 0–2 0.0% #543 1,578 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Catherine Tanvier
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1979 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
16 1980 — — — — 23 11 34 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 15 6 21 71.4% 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4%
18 1982 8 3 11 72.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 9 19 52.6% 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 4 11 63.6%
19 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 1984 5 5 10 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
20 1984 11 4 15 73.3% 15 3 18 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1985 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 1985 16 4 20 80.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7%
22 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 14 5 19 73.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 1987 2 4 6 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 1987 11 4 15 73.3% 14 6 20 70.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1988 11 5 16 68.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 1991 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
27 1991 0 5 5 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
28 1992 5 3 8 62.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 79 44 123 64.2% 137 74 211 64.9% 94 47 141 66.7% 84 69 153 54.9% — 40 45 85 47.1% 51 52 103 49.5% 28 32 60 46.7% 41 46 87 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Catherine Tanvier
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1977 1485 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1979 1481 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05 1980 1546 111.1 — — — — — +25 — 57.1% +0.79 2–0 0–1 — +0.83
16 1980 1754 141.9 — — — — -177 +14 -96 63.0% +1.28 11–8 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 102.1 +2.19 1981 1540 110.2 — — — — +71 +74 +8 34.9% -1.14 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.01
17 1981 1839 144.2 — — — — -30 +101 -183 61.9% +0.82 9–6 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 108.3 +1.97 1982 1801 145.8 — — — — -102 -58 -144 54.0% +0.40 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 106.1 -4.11
18 1982 1909 149.0 — — — — -39 -95 -105 56.3% +0.45 10–6 (63%) 9–5 (64%) 105.4 -3.56 1983 1826 138.7 — — — — +20 -51 -192 52.0% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -0.26
19 1983 1871 146.4 — — — — -37 -5 +26 57.3% +0.57 9–5 (64%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -2.04 1984 1778 138.4 — — — — +11 +67 -119 52.4% +0.25 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 101.9 -0.85
20 1984 2020 157.9 — — — — -105 +10 -19 68.9% +1.35 11–7 (61%) 7–2 (78%) 106.9 -0.85 1985 1775 131.9 — — — — -9 +35 -111 54.3% +0.26 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.4 -0.41
21 1985 2117 168.7 — — — — -41 -27 -48 67.3% +1.34 11–5 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 101.3 -5.33 1986 1826 142.0 — — — — +17 -76 -150 47.6% -0.15 9–1 (90%) 4–3 (57%) 108.6 -1.68
22 1986 2051 166.8 — — — — +5 +61 +33 69.2% +1.38 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) 94.1 -3.82 1987 1619 112.9 — — — — +55 +15 +55 38.8% -0.72 5–6 (45%) 1–7 (13%) 92.3 -0.42
23 1987 2019 157.7 — — — — +25 +60 +93 66.1% +1.25 7–2 (78%) 6–4 (60%) 105.5 -4.06 1988 1604 122.4 — — — — +7 +16 +40 40.7% -0.54 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — -1.01
24 1988 1944 157.8 — — — — +22 +69 +216 66.7% +1.34 6–6 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 95.8 -2.14 1989 1674 141.0 — — — — -11 -62 +28 50.9% +0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–0 — -0.68
25 1989 1852 145.0 — — — — +53 — +235 50.7% +0.23 8–3 (73%) 0–6 (0%) 94.9 -0.60 1990 1657 111.6 — — — — 0 -81 +75 45.0% -0.43 2–0 1–1 — +0.74
26 1990 1791 135.8 — — — — +1 +129 +296 50.6% +0.34 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 95.8 -1.35 1991 1603 113.4 — — — — +31 -73 — 40.5% -0.43 4–1 (80%) 0–3 (0%) 101.2 +0.59
27 1991 1681 120.9 — — — — +20 +142 +305 46.8% -0.32 3–8 (27%) 6–2 (75%) 93.8 +0.54 1992 1614 106.1 — — — — +44 — — 42.9% -0.57 2–0 — — +1.48
28 1992 1646 122.3 — — — — +44 +113 +331 42.9% -0.62 4–2 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.52 1993 1578 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.11
Career — 2158 157.5 — — — — -16 +44 +48 60.8% +0.85 99–69 (59%) 57–57 (50%) 100.8 -3.09 — 1879 137.0 — — — — +7 -13 -54 47.4% -0.16 49–31 (61%) 23–32 (42%) 105.2 -1.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.