H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 1–0 lead over Dagmar Schafer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1985 Zurich round of 16 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 6-2 6-2 | Dagmar Schafer | Match data | Nov 1, 1985* | R16 | Zurich | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | #387 | #4 | 77 | 2,158 | 401 | 234 | 63.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| Dagmar Schafer | — | — | — | 1,514 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Dagmar Schafer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 36–18 | 66.7% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,838 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,909 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #8 | 2,019 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #5 | 2,117 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #7 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #10 | 2,019 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #12 | 1,944 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #37 | 1,852 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #46 | 1,791 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #85 | 1,681 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #78 | 1,646 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Dagmar Schafer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1977 | 1485 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 | 1985 | 1513 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.11 |
| 1979 | 1481 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 1754 | 141.9 | — | — | — | — | -177 | +14 | -96 | 63.0% | +1.28 | 11–8 (58%) | 2–5 (29%) | 102.1 | +2.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 1839 | 144.2 | — | — | — | — | -30 | +101 | -183 | 61.9% | +0.82 | 9–6 (60%) | 8–4 (67%) | 108.3 | +1.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 1909 | 149.0 | — | — | — | — | -39 | -95 | -105 | 56.3% | +0.45 | 10–6 (63%) | 9–5 (64%) | 105.4 | -3.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 1871 | 146.4 | — | — | — | — | -37 | -5 | +26 | 57.3% | +0.57 | 9–5 (64%) | 5–8 (38%) | 100.9 | -2.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 2020 | 157.9 | — | — | — | — | -105 | +10 | -19 | 68.9% | +1.35 | 11–7 (61%) | 7–2 (78%) | 106.9 | -0.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 2117 | 168.7 | — | — | — | — | -41 | -27 | -48 | 67.3% | +1.34 | 11–5 (69%) | 4–7 (36%) | 101.3 | -5.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 2051 | 166.8 | — | — | — | — | +5 | +61 | +33 | 69.2% | +1.38 | 4–5 (44%) | 4–7 (36%) | 94.1 | -3.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 2019 | 157.7 | — | — | — | — | +25 | +60 | +93 | 66.1% | +1.25 | 7–2 (78%) | 6–4 (60%) | 105.5 | -4.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 1944 | 157.8 | — | — | — | — | +22 | +69 | +216 | 66.7% | +1.34 | 6–6 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | 95.8 | -2.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 1852 | 145.0 | — | — | — | — | +53 | — | +235 | 50.7% | +0.23 | 8–3 (73%) | 0–6 (0%) | 94.9 | -0.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 1791 | 135.8 | — | — | — | — | +1 | +129 | +296 | 50.6% | +0.34 | 6–5 (55%) | 3–4 (43%) | 95.8 | -1.35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 1681 | 120.9 | — | — | — | — | +20 | +142 | +305 | 46.8% | -0.32 | 3–8 (27%) | 6–2 (75%) | 93.8 | +0.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1646 | 122.3 | — | — | — | — | +44 | +113 | +331 | 42.9% | -0.62 | 4–2 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2158 | 157.5 | — | — | — | — | -16 | +44 | +48 | 60.8% | +0.85 | 99–69 (59%) | 57–57 (50%) | 100.8 | -3.09 | Career | 1514 | 103.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +5.50 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Navratilova | 2 | 21 | 23 | Feb 5, 1989 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 2 | 12 | 14 | Jul 1, 1990 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 5 | 9 | 14 | Jun 15, 1990 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 6 | 7 | 13 | Jan 17, 1992 | H2H |
| Chris Evert | 0 | 12 | 12 | Jul 3, 1987 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 0 | 1 | 1 | Nov 1, 1985 | H2H |
| Csilla Cserepy | 1 | 0 | 1 | Oct 31, 1985 | H2H |