H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Florenta Mihai H2H: 0-1
Florenta Mihai holds a 1–0 lead over Claudia Kohde Kilsch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Florenta Mihai leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Florenta Mihai won the 1980 Perugia second round 4-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 62
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 1980* | Perugia | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Florenta Mihai | 4-6 6-4 6-1 | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | #387 | #4 | 77 | 2,157 | 401 | 233 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
| Florenta Mihai | — | — | — | 1,803 | 93 | 90 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Florenta Mihai | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1980 | 36–18 | 66.7% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,914 | 0 | 8 | 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 8 | 1975 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1984 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #8 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1985 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #5 | 2,115 | 0 | 10 | 1977 | 16–13 | 55.2% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1986 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 10 | 1978 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1987 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #10 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | 1979 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1988 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,952 | 0 | 11 | 1980 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 11 | 1981 | 30–13 | 69.8% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1990 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #46 | 1,792 | 0 | 12 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #85 | 1,682 | 0 | 12 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #78 | 1,647 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |