H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Helen Kelesi H2H: 1-3
Helen Kelesi holds a 3–1 lead over Claudia Kohde Kilsch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Helen Kelesi leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Helen Kelesi won the 1988 Hilton Head fourth round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 62
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 1988* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Helen Kelesi | 6-4 7-5 | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1987 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Helen Kelesi | 6-2 6-3 | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Match data |
| Apr 17, 1987* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Helen Kelesi | 6-3 6-4 | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Match data |
| Feb 20, 1987* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 6-1 4-6 6-2 | Helen Kelesi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | #387 | #4 | 77 | 2,157 | 401 | 233 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
| Helen Kelesi | #755 | #13 | 54 | 1,958 | 213 | 164 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Helen Kelesi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1980 | 36–18 | 66.7% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1981 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1982 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,914 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1983 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1984 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #8 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 1990 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #25 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1985 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #5 | 2,115 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #29 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1986 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1987 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #10 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #48 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1988 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,952 | 0 | 11 | 1994 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #46 | 1,792 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #85 | 1,682 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #78 | 1,647 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |