H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Isabelle Demongeot H2H: 2-1

Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 2–1 lead over Isabelle Demongeot in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Isabelle Demongeot leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Isabelle Demongeot won the 1992 Italian Open round of 64 6-3 6-3.

GER Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
FRA Age 60 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Isabelle Demongeot #72 6-3 6-3 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #64 Match data May 6, 1992* R64 Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #30 6-1 3-6 6-1 Isabelle Demongeot #42 Match data Aug 4, 1989* R16 San Diego WTA 500 Hard
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #9 6-3 5-7 6-3 Isabelle Demongeot #51 Match data Mar 17, 1988* R32 Key Biscayne WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Claudia Kohde Kilsch — #4 77 2,158 401 234 63.1% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Isabelle Demongeot — #35 69 1,842 119 157 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Isabelle Demongeot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,754 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,839 0 5 1984 1–1 50.0% #165 1,513 0 0
18 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,910 0 8 1985 4–7 36.4% #135 1,520 0 0
19 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8 1986 11–15 42.3% #65 1,608 0 0
20 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,020 0 9 1987 17–20 45.9% #53 1,732 0 0
21 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,118 0 10 1988 19–19 50.0% #45 1,759 0 0
22 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,051 0 10 1989 18–15 54.5% #46 1,766 0 0
23 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 2,019 0 10 1990 15–17 46.9% #78 1,687 0 0
24 1988 39–19 67.2% #12 1,944 0 11 1991 13–14 48.1% #63 1,683 0 1
25 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,852 0 11 1992 7–17 29.2% #136 1,626 0 1
26 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,791 0 12 1993 5–11 31.2% #150 1,593 0 1
27 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,681 0 12 1994 3–9 25.0% #130 1,542 0 1
28 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,646 0 12 1995 5–9 35.7% #160 1,546 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1996 1–3 25.0% #242 1,529 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Isabelle Demongeot
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1979 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1980 — — — — 23 11 34 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 15 6 21 71.4% 1984 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1982 8 3 11 72.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 9 19 52.6% 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 1986 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
20 1984 11 4 15 73.3% 15 3 18 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1987 7 8 15 46.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
21 1985 16 4 20 80.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1988 5 8 13 38.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 14 5 19 73.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 1987 11 4 15 73.3% 14 6 20 70.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 1988 11 5 16 68.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1991 10 8 18 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1992 3 11 14 21.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1991 0 5 5 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1992 5 3 8 62.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 79 44 123 64.2% 137 74 211 64.9% 94 47 141 66.7% 84 69 153 54.9% — 58 70 128 45.3% 30 43 73 41.1% 19 23 42 45.2% 12 21 33 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Isabelle Demongeot
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1977 1485 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1979 1481 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1980 1755 142.0 — — — — -175 +15 -97 63.0% +1.28 11–8 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 102.1 +1.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 1840 144.2 — — — — -32 +102 -184 61.9% +0.82 9–6 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 108.3 +1.73 1984 1514 102.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — +0.09
18 1982 1910 149.2 — — — — -38 -95 -105 56.3% +0.45 10–6 (63%) 9–5 (64%) 105.4 -3.08 1985 1520 106.0 — — — — — +8 +101 36.4% -0.95 — — — +0.76
19 1983 1872 146.6 — — — — -38 -5 +24 57.3% +0.57 9–5 (64%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -1.59 1986 1609 129.8 — — — — -40 -64 +53 45.8% -0.20 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 96.1 +0.39
20 1984 2020 158.0 — — — — -104 +10 -20 68.9% +1.35 11–7 (61%) 7–2 (78%) 106.9 -0.59 1987 1732 140.7 — — — — -56 -238 +22 45.2% -0.20 6–4 (60%) 0–1 — -0.68
21 1985 2118 168.8 — — — — -41 -28 -48 67.3% +1.34 11–5 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 101.3 -5.52 1988 1759 143.6 — — — — -71 -64 -55 53.9% +0.18 5–10 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 100.3 -3.64
22 1986 2052 166.9 — — — — +4 +60 +33 69.2% +1.38 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) 94.1 -3.57 1989 1766 145.6 — — — — -3 -36 -73 53.3% +0.31 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 101.0 -3.33
23 1987 2020 157.8 — — — — +25 +60 +92 66.1% +1.25 7–2 (78%) 6–4 (60%) 105.4 -3.94 1990 1688 134.1 — — — — +78 -6 — 43.5% -0.58 5–4 (56%) 3–1 (75%) 103.7 -1.98
24 1988 1945 157.8 — — — — +22 +68 +214 66.7% +1.34 6–6 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 95.8 -2.17 1991 1683 123.3 — — — — +68 -79 — 52.5% -0.12 2–5 (29%) 6–1 (86%) 98.5 +0.46
25 1989 1853 145.1 — — — — +52 — +233 50.7% +0.23 8–3 (73%) 0–6 (0%) 94.9 -0.60 1992 1626 122.8 — — — — -19 -17 +52 32.7% -0.90 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 96.6 -1.74
26 1990 1791 135.8 — — — — +1 +129 +295 50.6% +0.34 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 95.8 -1.35 1993 1593 116.3 — — — — +3 -6 — 33.3% -1.23 4–3 (57%) 1–0 — -0.63
27 1991 1682 120.9 — — — — +20 +141 +305 46.8% -0.32 3–8 (27%) 6–2 (75%) 93.8 +0.54 1994 1542 110.1 — — — — +37 +40 — 29.6% -1.11 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.9 +0.54
28 1992 1646 122.3 — — — — +45 +113 +332 42.9% -0.62 4–2 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.52 1995 1547 116.6 — — — — +52 -12 +36 38.7% -0.45 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.04
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1530 101.6 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–0 — +0.15
Career — 2159 157.6 — — — — -16 +44 +47 60.8% +0.85 99–69 (59%) 57–57 (50%) 100.8 -2.94 — 1842 138.2 — — — — +1 -49 +22 44.7% -0.34 32–42 (43%) 24–19 (56%) 99.7 -3.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.