H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Isabelle Demongeot H2H: 2-1

Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 2–1 lead over Isabelle Demongeot in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Isabelle Demongeot leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Isabelle Demongeot won the 1992 Rome second round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Isabelle Demongeot
FRA Age 59 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 6, 1992* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Isabelle Demongeot #72 6-3 6-3 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #64 Match data
Aug 4, 1989* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Claudia Kohde Kilsch #30 6-1 3-6 6-1 Isabelle Demongeot #42 Match data
Mar 17, 1988* Key Biscayne WTA 250 R32 Hard Claudia Kohde Kilsch #9 6-3 5-7 6-3 Isabelle Demongeot #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Isabelle Demongeot #522 #35 69 1,850 119 156 43.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Isabelle Demongeot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,755 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,841 0 5 1984 1–1 50.0% #165 1,513 0 0
18 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,914 0 8 1985 4–7 36.4% #135 1,520 0 0
19 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8 1986 11–15 42.3% #65 1,609 0 0
20 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9 1987 17–20 45.9% #53 1,732 0 0
21 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10 1988 19–18 51.4% #45 1,774 0 0
22 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10 1989 18–15 54.5% #46 1,771 0 0
23 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10 1990 15–17 46.9% #78 1,705 0 0
24 1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11 1991 13–14 48.1% #63 1,690 0 1
25 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11 1992 7–17 29.2% #136 1,629 0 1
26 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12 1993 5–11 31.2% #150 1,593 0 1
27 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12 1994 3–9 25.0% #130 1,542 0 1
28 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12 1995 5–9 35.7% #160 1,547 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1996 1–3 25.0% #242 1,530 0 1