H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Jana Novotna H2H: 2-2
Claudia Kohde Kilsch and Jana Novotna are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jana Novotna leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jana Novotna won the 1991 Zurich fourth round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 62
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 1991* | Zurich | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jana Novotna | 6-3 6-1 | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Match data |
| Apr 4, 1991* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jana Novotna | 6-1 6-2 | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Match data |
| Jan 8, 1988* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 6-4 6-3 | Jana Novotna | Match data |
| Feb 24, 1987* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R128 | Hard | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 4-6 7-5 6-2 | Jana Novotna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | #387 | #4 | 77 | 2,157 | 401 | 233 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
| Jana Novotna | #18 | #2 | 5,063 | 2,224 | 504 | 198 | 71.8% | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 24 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Jana Novotna | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1980 | 36–18 | 66.7% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,914 | 0 | 8 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #35 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1984 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #8 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #11 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1985 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #5 | 2,115 | 0 | 10 | 1990 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #13 | 2,016 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1986 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,072 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1987 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #10 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1988 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,952 | 0 | 11 | 1993 | 46–15 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,103 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 11 | 1994 | 43–11 | 79.6% | #4 | 2,141 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1990 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #46 | 1,792 | 0 | 12 | 1995 | 30–12 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #85 | 1,682 | 0 | 12 | 1996 | 47–12 | 79.7% | #5 | 2,209 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #78 | 1,647 | 0 | 12 | 1997 | 52–15 | 77.6% | #2 | 2,173 | 0 | 19 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,129 | 1 | 23 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,924 | 1 | 24 |