H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Jo Durie H2H: 5-2

Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 5–2 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 2–1 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1986 US Open third round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Jo Durie
GBR Age 65 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 1986* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Claudia Kohde Kilsch #6 6-2 6-3 Jo Durie #20 Match data
Jan 18, 1986* Worcester WTA 250 QF Carpet Claudia Kohde Kilsch #5 6-3 6-4 Jo Durie #26 Match data
Dec 4, 1985* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Grass Claudia Kohde Kilsch #5 3-6 6-1 6-2 Jo Durie #31 Match data
Jun 28, 1985* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Jo Durie #56 4-6 6-1 6-2 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #8 Match data
Nov 23, 1984* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Grass Claudia Kohde Kilsch #8 7-5 6-4 Jo Durie #20 Match data
Apr 19, 1984* Amelia Island WTA 250 R32 Clay Claudia Kohde Kilsch #18 6-4 7-6 Jo Durie #5 Match data
Mar 11, 1983* Dallas WTA 250 R16 Carpet Jo Durie 2-6 6-2 6-3 Claudia Kohde Kilsch Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,099 314 264 54.3% 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Jo Durie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0
15 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0
16 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,755 0 1 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,601 0 0
17 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,841 0 5 1978 18–10 64.3% — 1,618 0 1
18 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,914 0 8 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3
19 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,734 0 4
20 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7
21 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7
22 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10 1983 47–18 72.3% — 2,093 0 9
23 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,889 0 9
24 1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,799 0 9
25 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9
26 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9
27 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,704 0 9
28 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,674 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,717 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,693 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,562 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,554 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,547 0 9