H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Kate Latham H2H: 2-0

Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 2–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1982 Australian Open round of 64 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Claudia Kohde Kilsch
GER Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Claudia Kohde Kilsch 6-1 6-0 Kate Latham Match data Dec 3, 1982* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Claudia Kohde Kilsch 6-3 6-3 Kate Latham Match data Aug 18, 1982* R32 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,158 401 234 63.1% 0 0 0 3 9 12
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,754 0 1 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,838 0 5 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
18 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,909 0 8 — — — — — — —
19 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,019 0 9 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,117 0 10 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,051 0 10 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 2,019 0 10 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 1988 39–19 67.2% #12 1,944 0 11 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3
25 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,852 0 11 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3
26 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,791 0 12 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3
27 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,681 0 12 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4
28 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,646 0 12 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1979 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1980 — — — — 23 11 34 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 15 6 21 71.4% 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 8 3 11 72.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1984 11 4 15 73.3% 15 3 18 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1985 16 4 20 80.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 14 5 19 73.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1987 11 4 15 73.3% 14 6 20 70.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1988 11 5 16 68.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 1991 0 5 5 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 1992 5 3 8 62.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 79 44 123 64.2% 137 74 211 64.9% 94 47 141 66.7% 84 69 153 54.9% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1977 1485 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1979 1481 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1980 1754 141.9 — — — — -177 +14 -96 63.0% +1.28 11–8 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 102.1 +2.19 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 1981 1839 144.2 — — — — -30 +101 -183 61.9% +0.82 9–6 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 108.3 +1.97 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
18 1982 1909 149.0 — — — — -39 -95 -105 56.3% +0.45 10–6 (63%) 9–5 (64%) 105.4 -3.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1983 1871 146.4 — — — — -37 -5 +26 57.3% +0.57 9–5 (64%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -2.04 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62
20 1984 2020 157.9 — — — — -105 +10 -19 68.9% +1.35 11–7 (61%) 7–2 (78%) 106.9 -0.85 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1985 2117 168.7 — — — — -41 -27 -48 67.3% +1.34 11–5 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 101.3 -5.33 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26
22 1986 2051 166.8 — — — — +5 +61 +33 69.2% +1.38 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) 94.1 -3.82 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75
23 1987 2019 157.7 — — — — +25 +60 +93 66.1% +1.25 7–2 (78%) 6–4 (60%) 105.5 -4.06 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30
24 1988 1944 157.8 — — — — +22 +69 +216 66.7% +1.34 6–6 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 95.8 -2.14 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90
25 1989 1852 145.0 — — — — +53 — +235 50.7% +0.23 8–3 (73%) 0–6 (0%) 94.9 -0.60 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03
26 1990 1791 135.8 — — — — +1 +129 +296 50.6% +0.34 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 95.8 -1.35 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22
27 1991 1681 120.9 — — — — +20 +142 +305 46.8% -0.32 3–8 (27%) 6–2 (75%) 93.8 +0.54 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81
28 1992 1646 122.3 — — — — +44 +113 +331 42.9% -0.62 4–2 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.52 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
Career — 2158 157.5 — — — — -16 +44 +48 60.8% +0.85 99–69 (59%) 57–57 (50%) 100.8 -3.09 — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.