H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Kate Latham H2H: 2-0

Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 2–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1982 Australian Open second round 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Kate Latham
Age 73

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Dec 3, 1982* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Grass Claudia Kohde Kilsch 6-1 6-0 Kate Latham Match data
Aug 18, 1982* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Claudia Kohde Kilsch 6-3 6-3 Kate Latham Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Kate Latham — — — 1,866 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,755 0 1 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,841 0 5 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,476 0 0
18 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,914 0 8 — — — — — — —
19 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,503 0 0
20 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,844 0 3
22 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,690 0 3
23 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,680 0 3
24 1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,755 0 3
25 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,661 0 3
26 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,848 0 3
27 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,750 0 4
28 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,688 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,625 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,494 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,528 0 6