H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Lea Antonoplis H2H: 1-0

Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 1–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1982 Detroit third round 6-7 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 4, 1982* Detroit WTA 250 R32 Carpet Claudia Kohde Kilsch 6-7 6-3 6-2 Lea Antonoplis Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,774 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Lea Antonoplis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,579 0 0
15 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0
16 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,755 0 1 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,559 0 0
17 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,841 0 5 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,626 0 0
18 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,914 0 8 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,665 0 0
19 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,717 0 0
20 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,724 0 1
21 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,735 0 2
22 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,719 0 2
23 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2
24 1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2
25 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2
26 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,572 0 2
27 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,460 0 2
28 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,413 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,455 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,448 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,432 0 2