H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 0-1
Leila Meskhi holds a 1–0 lead over Claudia Kohde Kilsch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leila Meskhi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1991 Roland Garros second round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 62
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 1991* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Leila Meskhi | 7-5 6-1 | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | #387 | #4 | 77 | 2,157 | 401 | 233 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 2,001 | 192 | 119 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1980 | 36–18 | 66.7% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,914 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 8 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #8 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #5 | 2,115 | 0 | 10 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1986 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 10 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1987 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #10 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1988 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,952 | 0 | 11 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 11 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1990 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #46 | 1,792 | 0 | 12 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #85 | 1,682 | 0 | 12 | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #78 | 1,647 | 0 | 12 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |