H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Liz Smylie H2H: 5-2

Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 5–2 lead over Liz Smylie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 4–1 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Liz Smylie won the 1991 Australian Open round of 128 2-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Claudia Kohde Kilsch
GER Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main-draw meetings
Liz Smylie
AUS Age 63 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Liz Smylie #54 2-6 6-4 6-4 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #44 Match data Jan 16, 1991* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #11 6-3 6-0 Liz Smylie #68 Match data Jun 16, 1988* R32 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #10 6-2 6-1 Liz Smylie #24 Match data Jun 28, 1987* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #9 6-2 6-4 Liz Smylie #30 Match data Feb 25, 1987* R64 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #8 7-6(3) 4-6 6-2 Liz Smylie #82 Match data Jan 23, 1987* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #5 6-3 6-3 Liz Smylie #35 Match data Nov 21, 1985* R32 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Liz Smylie 7-5 2-6 7-5 Claudia Kohde Kilsch Match data Nov 21, 1980* R16 Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,158 401 234 63.1% 0 0 0 3 9 12
Liz Smylie #501 #20 29 1,823 161 189 46.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Liz Smylie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,754 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,838 0 5 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,630 0 1
18 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,909 0 8 1981 2–10 16.7% — 1,515 0 1
19 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8 1982 15–8 65.2% — 1,628 0 3
20 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,019 0 9 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,754 0 4
21 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,117 0 10 1984 13–18 41.9% #36 1,765 0 4
22 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,051 0 10 1985 16–19 45.7% #43 1,729 0 4
23 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 2,019 0 10 1986 6–13 31.6% #114 1,668 0 4
24 1988 39–19 67.2% #12 1,944 0 11 1987 20–14 58.8% #27 1,747 0 5
25 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,852 0 11 1988 4–12 25.0% #153 1,607 0 5
26 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,791 0 12 1989 21–22 48.8% #66 1,681 0 5
27 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,681 0 12 1990 15–16 48.4% #53 1,665 0 5
28 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,646 0 12 1991 9–16 36.0% #116 1,612 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 1992 0–1 0.0% #209 1,599 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1993 7–15 31.8% #125 1,549 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1994 2–7 22.2% #192 1,515 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Liz Smylie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1979 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1980 — — — — 23 11 34 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 15 6 21 71.4% 1980 — — — — — — — — 10 3 13 76.9% — — — —
18 1982 8 3 11 72.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 9 19 52.6% 1981 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
19 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — —
20 1984 11 4 15 73.3% 15 3 18 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1985 16 4 20 80.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 14 5 19 73.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 1985 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 9 7 16 56.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1987 11 4 15 73.3% 14 6 20 70.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1988 11 5 16 68.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 1989 14 14 28 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1991 0 5 5 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1990 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 1992 5 3 8 62.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1991 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
Career — 79 44 123 64.2% 137 74 211 64.9% 94 47 141 66.7% 84 69 153 54.9% — 51 80 131 38.9% 11 19 30 36.7% 84 60 144 58.3% 13 29 42 31.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Liz Smylie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1977 1485 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1979 1481 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1980 1754 141.9 — — — — -177 +14 -96 63.0% +1.28 11–8 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 102.1 +2.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 1839 144.2 — — — — -30 +101 -183 61.9% +0.82 9–6 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 108.3 +1.97 1980 1630 113.8 — — — — — — +68 63.6% +0.73 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) 103.1 +1.27
18 1982 1909 149.0 — — — — -39 -95 -105 56.3% +0.45 10–6 (63%) 9–5 (64%) 105.4 -3.56 1981 1516 99.0 — — — — +29 +16 +113 20.0% -1.68 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.93
19 1983 1871 146.4 — — — — -37 -5 +26 57.3% +0.57 9–5 (64%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -2.04 1982 1628 117.1 — — — — — +36 +61 59.3% +0.70 8–2 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 106.2 +1.87
20 1984 2020 157.9 — — — — -105 +10 -19 68.9% +1.35 11–7 (61%) 7–2 (78%) 106.9 -0.85 1983 1754 135.8 — — — — -168 -34 +79 54.4% +0.25 8–5 (62%) 3–3 (50%) 104.5 +2.10
21 1985 2117 168.7 — — — — -41 -27 -48 67.3% +1.34 11–5 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 101.3 -5.33 1984 1765 122.9 — — — — -245 -129 +140 45.6% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.5 -1.24
22 1986 2051 166.8 — — — — +5 +61 +33 69.2% +1.38 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) 94.1 -3.82 1985 1730 128.1 — — — — -158 — +131 47.1% -0.38 7–8 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 -0.38
23 1987 2019 157.7 — — — — +25 +60 +93 66.1% +1.25 7–2 (78%) 6–4 (60%) 105.5 -4.06 1986 1669 119.0 — — — — -124 -109 +185 38.5% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 -0.61
24 1988 1944 157.8 — — — — +22 +69 +216 66.7% +1.34 6–6 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 95.8 -2.14 1987 1747 133.3 — — — — -128 — +164 57.7% +0.17 5–5 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.3 +0.13
25 1989 1852 145.0 — — — — +53 — +235 50.7% +0.23 8–3 (73%) 0–6 (0%) 94.9 -0.60 1988 1607 97.5 — — — — -90 — +200 25.7% -1.91 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 +1.27
26 1990 1791 135.8 — — — — +1 +129 +296 50.6% +0.34 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 95.8 -1.35 1989 1682 124.8 — — — — -34 -171 +107 47.1% -0.16 10–6 (63%) 5–7 (42%) 101.1 +1.75
27 1991 1681 120.9 — — — — +20 +142 +305 46.8% -0.32 3–8 (27%) 6–2 (75%) 93.8 +0.54 1990 1665 124.3 — — — — +4 — +123 47.1% -0.23 7–3 (70%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +0.59
28 1992 1646 122.3 — — — — +44 +113 +331 42.9% -0.62 4–2 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.52 1991 1613 115.0 — — — — -44 — +187 37.9% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 103.0 -0.32
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1600 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1550 117.2 — — — — -36 — +259 37.0% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 0–2 — +0.46
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1515 99.5 — — — — -31 — +232 31.6% -1.79 1–2 (33%) — — +0.11
Career — 2158 157.5 — — — — -16 +44 +48 60.8% +0.85 99–69 (59%) 57–57 (50%) 100.8 -3.09 — 1824 127.3 — — — — -80 -43 +132 46.2% -0.37 67–54 (55%) 30–38 (44%) 100.0 +2.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.