H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 2-2

Claudia Kohde Kilsch and Lori Mcneil are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 2–0 on carpet, while Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1988 Chicago third round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 10, 1988* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Lori Mcneil #13 6-4 6-1 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #11 Match data
Oct 30, 1988* Brighton WTA 250 QF Carpet Lori Mcneil #12 6-2 6-3 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #11 Match data
May 28, 1986* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Claudia Kohde Kilsch #4 6-4 6-1 Lori Mcneil #76 Match data
Dec 5, 1983* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Grass Claudia Kohde Kilsch 7-6 3-6 6-4 Lori Mcneil Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,755 0 1 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,841 0 5 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,914 0 8 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11