H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 1-0

Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 1–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1988 Key Biscayne first round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 15, 1988* Key Biscayne WTA 250 R128 Hard Claudia Kohde Kilsch #9 6-4 6-1 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer — — — 1,849 181 203 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Claudia Kohde Kilsch Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,755 0 1 1985 6–3 66.7% — 1,542 0 1
1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,841 0 5 1986 13–10 56.5% — 1,683 0 1
1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,914 0 8 1987 10–17 37.0% — 1,659 0 1
1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8 1988 11–20 35.5% — 1,588 0 1
1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9 1989 13–17 43.3% — 1,593 0 1
1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10 1990 18–18 50.0% — 1,746 0 1
1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10 1991 21–19 52.5% — 1,740 0 1
1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10 1992 13–17 43.3% — 1,697 0 1
1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11 1993 21–18 53.8% — 1,748 0 1
1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11 1994 22–22 50.0% — 1,772 0 1
1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12 1995 20–18 52.6% — 1,780 0 1
1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12 1996 8–18 30.8% — 1,663 0 1
1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12 1997 5–4 55.6% — 1,672 0 1