H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 0-3

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 3–0 lead over Claudia Kohde Kilsch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1992 Eastbourne second round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 17, 1992* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Mary Joe Fernandez #7 6-3 6-1 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #73 Match data
Oct 4, 1991* Milan WTA 250 R16 Carpet Mary Joe Fernandez #7 6-2 6-0 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #100 Match data
Jun 3, 1986* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Mary Joe Fernandez #50 7-6(4) 7-5 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #4 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,755 0 1 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,841 0 5 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,914 0 8 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7