H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Mary Lou Piatek H2H: 1-1

Claudia Kohde Kilsch and Mary Lou Piatek are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on carpet, while Mary Lou Piatek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Lou Piatek won the 1989 Los Angeles third round 7-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Mary Lou Piatek

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 10, 1989* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Mary Lou Piatek 7-6 7-6 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #30 Match data
Mar 13, 1986* Dallas WTA 250 R32 Carpet Claudia Kohde Kilsch #4 6-4 6-4 Mary Lou Piatek Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Mary Lou Piatek — — — 1,936 153 206 42.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Claudia Kohde Kilsch Mary Lou Piatek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1979 3–5 37.5% — 1,546 0 0
1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,755 0 1 1980 16–12 57.1% — 1,737 0 0
1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,841 0 5 1981 30–22 57.7% — 1,873 0 1
1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,914 0 8 1982 18–21 46.2% — 1,792 0 1
1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8 1983 12–20 37.5% — 1,721 0 1
1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9 1984 18–20 47.4% — 1,703 0 2
1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10 1985 14–18 43.8% — 1,678 0 2
1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10 1986 8–15 34.8% — 1,619 0 2
1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10 1987 6–12 33.3% — 1,594 0 2
1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11 1988 6–16 27.3% — 1,542 0 2
1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11 1989 7–15 31.8% — 1,593 0 2
1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12 1990 8–11 42.1% — 1,612 0 2
1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12 1991 5–8 38.5% — 1,630 0 2
1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12 1992 1–8 11.1% — 1,560 0 2
— — — — — — — 1993 1–2 33.3% — 1,555 0 2