H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Nicole Bradtke H2H: 2-2

Claudia Kohde Kilsch and Nicole Bradtke are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 2–1 on grass, while Nicole Bradtke leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicole Bradtke won the 1990 Eastbourne second round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Nicole Bradtke
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 20, 1990* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Nicole Bradtke #47 6-1 6-1 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #68 Match data
May 29, 1988* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Nicole Bradtke #53 1-6 6-4 7-5 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #9 Match data
Jan 1, 1988* Brisbane WTA 500 R16 Grass Claudia Kohde Kilsch #10 5-7 6-3 7-5 Nicole Bradtke #78 Match data
Jan 16, 1987* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Grass Claudia Kohde Kilsch #7 6-2 6-2 Nicole Bradtke #125 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Nicole Bradtke #394 #24 256 1,868 181 162 52.8% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Nicole Bradtke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1985 1–2 33.3% #147 1,507 0 0
16 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,755 0 1 1986 6–5 54.5% #123 1,548 0 0
17 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,841 0 5 1987 15–19 44.1% #78 1,600 0 0
18 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,914 0 8 1988 24–17 58.5% #34 1,738 0 0
19 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8 1989 16–17 48.5% #61 1,710 0 0
20 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9 1990 21–20 51.2% #49 1,757 0 0
21 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10 1991 21–19 52.5% #45 1,760 0 0
22 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10 1992 21–17 55.3% #47 1,714 0 1
23 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10 1993 26–14 65.0% #26 1,757 0 2
24 1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11 1994 2–5 28.6% #153 1,705 0 2
25 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11 1995 21–15 58.3% #37 1,786 0 3
26 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12 1996 6–10 37.5% #94 1,709 0 3
27 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12 1997 1–2 33.3% #394 1,697 0 3
28 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12 — — — — — — —