H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Nicole Jagerman H2H: 1-1

Claudia Kohde Kilsch and Nicole Jagerman are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on grass, while Nicole Jagerman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1991 Wimbledon second round 7-6 6-2.

Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 1
2 main draw meetings
NED Age 58 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 28, 1991* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Claudia Kohde Kilsch #41 7-6 6-2 Nicole Jagerman #120 Match data
Jan 17, 1990* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Nicole Jagerman #79 6-4 7-6(3) Claudia Kohde Kilsch #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Nicole Jagerman #685 #43 24 1,736 79 99 44.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Nicole Jagerman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1977 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0
15 1979 0–1 0.0% 1,480 0 0
16 1980 36–18 66.7% 1,755 0 1
17 1981 40–22 64.5% 1,841 0 5
18 1982 34–23 59.6% 1,914 0 8 1986 9–4 69.2% #106 1,606 0 0
19 1983 29–20 59.2% 1,871 0 8 1987 0–10 0.0% #206 1,480 0 0
20 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9 1988 11–10 52.4% #72 1,583 0 0
21 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10 1989 13–15 46.4% #82 1,658 0 0
22 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10 1990 12–13 48.0% #68 1,698 0 0
23 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10 1991 10–11 47.6% #67 1,690 0 0
24 1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11 1992 7–13 35.0% #115 1,599 0 0
25 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11 1993 12–11 52.2% #68 1,667 0 0
26 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12 1994 4–11 26.7% #137 1,582 0 0
27 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12 1995 1–1 50.0% #215 1,600 0 0
28 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12