H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 3-0

Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 3–0 lead over Patricia Hy Boulais in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1990 Birmingham third round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Patricia Hy Boulais
Age 60 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 14, 1990* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Claudia Kohde Kilsch #55 6-2 6-1 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data
May 27, 1987* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Claudia Kohde Kilsch #10 6-2 6-3 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data
Jun 24, 1983* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Claudia Kohde Kilsch 6-3 6-3 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,907 140 163 46.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Patricia Hy Boulais
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,755 0 1 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,841 0 5 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0
18 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,914 0 8 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0
19 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8 — — — — — — —
20 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1
21 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1
22 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,530 0 1
23 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,500 0 1
24 1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,565 0 1
25 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,702 0 1
26 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12 1992 21–15 58.3% — 1,878 0 1
27 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,852 0 1
28 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1996 9–15 37.5% — 1,678 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,660 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,571 0 1