H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Rosalyn Fairbank H2H: 5-2

Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 5–2 lead over Rosalyn Fairbank in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Rosalyn Fairbank won the 1990 Chicago fourth round 6-3 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 16, 1990* Chicago WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Rosalyn Fairbank #27 6-3 3-6 6-3 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #69 Match data
Jun 16, 1989* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Claudia Kohde Kilsch #18 6-0 6-4 Rosalyn Fairbank #37 Match data
Nov 22, 1985* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Grass Claudia Kohde Kilsch #5 6-3 6-2 Rosalyn Fairbank #38 Match data
Apr 11, 1985* Hilton Head WTA 250 R32 Clay Claudia Kohde Kilsch #7 7-5 4-6 6-3 Rosalyn Fairbank #35 Match data
Aug 26, 1981* Mahwah WTA 250 R64 Hard Claudia Kohde Kilsch 6-4 4-6 6-1 Rosalyn Fairbank Match data
Aug 17, 1981 Toronto WTA 250 R32 Hard Rosalyn Fairbank 6-0 6-4 Claudia Kohde Kilsch Match data
Feb 13, 1981* Oakland WTA 250 R16 Carpet Claudia Kohde Kilsch 6-3 6-0 Rosalyn Fairbank Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,933 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Rosalyn Fairbank
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,755 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,841 0 5 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,525 0 0
18 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,914 0 8 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,720 0 0
19 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,681 0 0
20 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,657 0 0
21 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,904 0 0
22 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,920 0 1
23 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1
24 1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1
25 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1
26 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1
27 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,775 0 1
28 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,846 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,789 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,728 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1