H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Shelly Walpole H2H: 1-0
Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 1–0 lead over Shelly Walpole in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1982 Eastbourne second round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 62
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 1982* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 6-1 6-1 | Shelly Walpole | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | #387 | #4 | 77 | 2,157 | 401 | 233 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
| Shelly Walpole | — | — | — | 1,620 | 14 | 12 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Shelly Walpole | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 36–18 | 66.7% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,914 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #8 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #5 | 2,115 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #10 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,952 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #46 | 1,792 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #85 | 1,682 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #78 | 1,647 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |