H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Stacy Margolin H2H: 1-0
Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 1–0 lead over Stacy Margolin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1981 Toronto second round 6-7 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 62
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 67
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1981 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 6-7 6-3 6-2 | Stacy Margolin | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | #387 | #4 | 77 | 2,157 | 401 | 233 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
| Stacy Margolin | — | — | — | 1,855 | 73 | 98 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Stacy Margolin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1980 | 36–18 | 66.7% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1982 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,914 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1983 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 8 | 1978 | 16–5 | 76.2% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1984 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #8 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 1979 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1985 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #5 | 2,115 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 25–26 | 49.0% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1986 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 10 | 1981 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1987 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #10 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | 1982 | 4–14 | 22.2% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1988 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,952 | 0 | 11 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 11 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1990 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #46 | 1,792 | 0 | 12 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #85 | 1,682 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #78 | 1,647 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |