H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Tracy Austin H2H: 0-2

Tracy Austin holds a 2–0 lead over Claudia Kohde Kilsch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tracy Austin leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tracy Austin won the 1982 Wimbledon round of 16 6-3 6-3.

GER Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tracy Austin 6-3 6-3 Claudia Kohde Kilsch Match data Jun 30, 1982* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Tracy Austin 6-4 6-2 Claudia Kohde Kilsch Match data Oct 29, 1981* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Claudia Kohde Kilsch — #4 77 2,158 401 234 63.1% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Tracy Austin — #1 19 2,522 341 88 79.5% 2 0 1 12 15 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Tracy Austin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — 1977 14–8 63.6% — 1,780 0 1
15 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1978 44–13 77.2% #6 2,087 0 3
16 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,754 0 1 1979 73–12 85.9% #3 2,436 1 10
17 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,839 0 5 1980 82–10 89.1% #2 2,463 1 21
18 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,910 0 8 1981 56–7 88.9% #2 2,449 2 29
19 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8 1982 35–12 74.5% #4 2,267 2 30
20 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,020 0 9 1983 24–8 75.0% #9 2,189 2 30
21 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,118 0 10 1984 2–2 50.0% — 2,139 2 30
22 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,051 0 10 — — — — — — —
23 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 2,019 0 10 — — — — — — —
24 1988 39–19 67.2% #12 1,944 0 11 — — — — — — —
25 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,852 0 11 — — — — — — —
26 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,791 0 12 1989 0–2 0.0% — 2,081 2 30
27 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,681 0 12 — — — — — — —
28 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,646 0 12 — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — 1993 6–6 50.0% #117 1,972 2 30
31 — — — — — — — 1994 5–8 38.5% — 1,852 2 30

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Tracy Austin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 4 2 6 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
15 1979 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 13 3 16 81.3%
16 1980 — — — — 23 11 34 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1979 22 4 26 84.6% 10 0 10 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 33 6 39 84.6%
17 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 15 6 21 71.4% 1980 19 4 23 82.6% 8 1 9 88.9% 11 1 12 91.7% 44 4 48 91.7%
18 1982 8 3 11 72.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 9 19 52.6% 1981 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 20 4 24 83.3%
19 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 1982 11 2 13 84.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 15 6 21 71.4%
20 1984 11 4 15 73.3% 15 3 18 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1983 — — — — 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 12 5 17 70.6%
21 1985 16 4 20 80.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1984 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 14 5 19 73.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1987 11 4 15 73.3% 14 6 20 70.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1988 11 5 16 68.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1991 0 5 5 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 5 3 8 62.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 79 44 123 64.2% 137 74 211 64.9% 94 47 141 66.7% 84 69 153 54.9% — 102 26 128 79.7% 44 13 57 77.2% 49 14 63 77.8% 141 34 175 80.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Tracy Austin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1977 1485 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1781 150.1 — — — — -85 -31 — 59.1% +0.55 2–0 1–0 — -1.01
15 1979 1481 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05 1978 2087 165.9 — — — — -15 -282 -367 73.1% +2.01 6–3 (67%) 7–2 (78%) 108.9 -2.13
16 1980 1755 142.0 — — — — -175 +15 -97 63.0% +1.28 11–8 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 102.1 +1.88 1979 2436 178.9 — — — — +5 -373 -551 80.9% +2.33 13–3 (81%) 6–3 (67%) 110.9 -8.70
17 1981 1840 144.2 — — — — -32 +102 -184 61.9% +0.82 9–6 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 108.3 +1.73 1980 2464 180.2 — — — — +151 -327 -415 85.5% +3.11 12–3 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -4.53
18 1982 1910 149.2 — — — — -38 -95 -105 56.3% +0.45 10–6 (63%) 9–5 (64%) 105.4 -3.08 1981 2450 175.9 — — — — +119 -339 -340 84.6% +2.88 7–3 (70%) 7–4 (64%) 101.5 -3.61
19 1983 1872 146.6 — — — — -38 -5 +24 57.3% +0.57 9–5 (64%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -1.59 1982 2267 167.2 — — — — +185 -147 -207 75.5% +2.05 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 94.0 -1.41
20 1984 2020 158.0 — — — — -104 +10 -20 68.9% +1.35 11–7 (61%) 7–2 (78%) 106.9 -0.59 1983 2189 159.8 — — — — +140 -59 -83 76.5% +1.88 2–4 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 94.9 -1.86
21 1985 2118 168.8 — — — — -41 -28 -48 67.3% +1.34 11–5 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 101.3 -5.52 1984 2140 115.0 — — — — +111 — — 50.0% +0.13 — — — +0.03
22 1986 2052 166.9 — — — — +4 +60 +33 69.2% +1.38 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) 94.1 -3.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1987 2020 157.8 — — — — +25 +60 +92 66.1% +1.25 7–2 (78%) 6–4 (60%) 105.4 -3.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1988 1945 157.8 — — — — +22 +68 +214 66.7% +1.34 6–6 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 95.8 -2.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1989 1853 145.1 — — — — +52 — +233 50.7% +0.23 8–3 (73%) 0–6 (0%) 94.9 -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1990 1791 135.8 — — — — +1 +129 +295 50.6% +0.34 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 95.8 -1.35 1989 2082 101.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.05
27 1991 1682 120.9 — — — — +20 +141 +305 46.8% -0.32 3–8 (27%) 6–2 (75%) 93.8 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 1646 122.3 — — — — +45 +113 +332 42.9% -0.62 4–2 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1973 123.4 — — — — +28 — — 46.4% -0.97 3–1 (75%) — — -0.65
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1852 118.5 — — — — +78 +126 — 36.7% -0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -1.54
Career — 2159 157.6 — — — — -16 +44 +47 60.8% +0.85 99–69 (59%) 57–57 (50%) 100.8 -2.94 — 2522 175.8 — — — — +83 -173 -353 76.3% +2.13 52–25 (68%) 33–14 (70%) 108.9 -5.99

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.