H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Claudia Porwik vs Clare Wood H2H: 2-1
Claudia Porwik holds a 2–1 lead over Clare Wood in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Claudia Porwik leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Claudia Porwik won the 1996 Wimbledon first round 2-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 58
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1996* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Claudia Porwik | 2-6 7-5 6-4 | Clare Wood | Match data |
| Jan 1, 1992* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Claudia Porwik | 7-5 3-6 6-1 | Clare Wood | Match data |
| Feb 9, 1989* | Wellington | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Clare Wood | 2-6 6-1 6-4 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,788 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Clare Wood | #930 | #77 | 71 | 1,643 | 50 | 111 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudia Porwik | Clare Wood | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #304 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #171 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #141 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #181 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #146 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #130 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #87 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #138 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #187 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #593 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |