H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Claudia Porwik vs Dianne Van Rensburg H2H: 2-1

Claudia Porwik holds a 2–1 lead over Dianne Van Rensburg in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dianne Van Rensburg leads 1–0 on carpet, while Claudia Porwik leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Claudia Porwik won the 1993 Wimbledon first round 5-7 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Claudia Porwik
GER Age 57
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Dianne Van Rensburg
Age 58

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 23, 1993* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Claudia Porwik #96 5-7 6-1 6-2 Dianne Van Rensburg Match data
Jan 24, 1990* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Claudia Porwik #63 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 Dianne Van Rensburg Match data
Oct 12, 1989* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Carpet Dianne Van Rensburg 7-5 6-3 Claudia Porwik #86 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Claudia Porwik #579 #29 148 1,788 114 146 43.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dianne Van Rensburg — — — 1,790 82 92 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Porwik Dianne Van Rensburg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 6–5 54.5% #96 1,576 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1987 13–19 40.6% #104 1,582 0 0 1986 10–8 55.6% — 1,643 0 0
19 1988 11–16 40.7% #68 1,572 0 0 1987 11–19 36.7% — 1,597 0 0
20 1989 19–18 51.4% #75 1,662 0 0 1988 17–19 47.2% — 1,701 0 0
21 1990 18–17 51.4% #29 1,667 0 0 1989 15–20 42.9% — 1,653 0 0
22 1991 14–20 41.2% #80 1,645 0 0 1990 23–16 59.0% — 1,770 0 1
23 1992 12–18 40.0% #98 1,599 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1993 13–20 39.4% #92 1,599 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% — 1,748 0 1
25 1994 0–1 0.0% #256 1,583 0 0 1993 3–4 42.9% — 1,730 0 1
26 1995 4–7 36.4% #133 1,550 0 0 1994 3–4 42.9% — 1,696 0 1
27 1996 4–5 44.4% #153 1,562 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% — 1,672 0 1