H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Claudia Porwik vs Eva Krapl H2H: 4-0
Claudia Porwik holds a 4–0 lead over Eva Krapl in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Claudia Porwik leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Claudia Porwik won the 1989 Brisbane third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 60
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 1989* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Claudia Porwik | 6-4 6-1 | Eva Krapl | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1988* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Claudia Porwik | 6-2 7-6(3) | Eva Krapl | Match data |
| May 14, 1987* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Claudia Porwik | 6-4 6-3 | Eva Krapl | Match data |
| Mar 11, 1987* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Claudia Porwik | 6-1 7-6 | Eva Krapl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,788 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eva Krapl | #635 | #94 | 11 | 1,560 | 35 | 67 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudia Porwik | Eva Krapl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #129 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #115 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #202 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |