Claudia Porwik
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Bradtke | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 26, 1993 | H2H |
| Yayuk Basuki | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 14, 1996 | H2H |
| Judith Wiesner | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 28, 1995 | H2H |
| Meredith Mcgrath | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 15, 1993 | H2H |
| Monica Seles | 0 | 4 | 4 | Feb 18, 1993 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Claudia Porwik vs Kate Gompert H2H: 0-1
Kate Gompert holds a 1–0 lead over Claudia Porwik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kate Gompert leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kate Gompert won the 1987 Geneva round of 32 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kate Gompert | 6-3 6-4 | Claudia Porwik | Match data | May 21, 1987* | R32 | Geneva | WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,786 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kate Gompert | #316 | #18 | 34 | 1,871 | 85 | 81 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudia Porwik | Kate Gompert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #22 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #175 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #301 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Claudia Porwik | Kate Gompert | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1986 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1981 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 1988 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1982 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1983 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1990 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1984 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1991 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1985 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 1992 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1986 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 1993 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1987 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 25 | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1995 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1989 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 27 | 1996 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1990 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 73 | 83 | 156 | 46.8% | 13 | 21 | 34 | 38.2% | 11 | 20 | 31 | 35.5% | 17 | 22 | 39 | 43.6% | — | 37 | 38 | 75 | 49.3% | 26 | 18 | 44 | 59.1% | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 15 | 16 | 31 | 48.4% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Claudia Porwik | Kate Gompert | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1986 | 1577 | 117.2 | — | — | — | — | +14 | +33 | — | 50.0% | -0.42 | 3–1 (75%) | 3–1 (75%) | 105.3 | +0.65 | 1980 | 1539 | 117.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.90 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.24 |
| 18 | 1987 | 1582 | 120.5 | — | — | — | — | -4 | +32 | -42 | 44.7% | -0.46 | 4–8 (33%) | 4–1 (80%) | 97.8 | +1.43 | 1981 | 1584 | 114.4 | — | — | — | — | +12 | — | — | 60.0% | +0.73 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.14 |
| 19 | 1988 | 1572 | 125.4 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -30 | +14 | 41.4% | -0.72 | 2–2 (50%) | 5–2 (71%) | 103.4 | +0.38 | 1982 | 1588 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | -24 | — | — | 56.0% | +0.76 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | +1.45 |
| 20 | 1989 | 1661 | 127.0 | — | — | — | — | 0 | -72 | — | 52.9% | +0.09 | 4–7 (36%) | 2–3 (40%) | 97.4 | +0.85 | 1983 | 1673 | 129.7 | — | — | — | — | -18 | -62 | — | 60.0% | +0.60 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.11 |
| 21 | 1990 | 1667 | 133.5 | — | — | — | — | +11 | — | — | 52.5% | +0.25 | 6–8 (43%) | 5–2 (71%) | 99.4 | +1.00 | 1984 | 1651 | 117.2 | — | — | — | — | -40 | -19 | — | 50.0% | +0.55 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–0 | — | +0.68 |
| 22 | 1991 | 1645 | 123.9 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -98 | — | 42.7% | -0.60 | 3–4 (43%) | 5–4 (56%) | 100.4 | -1.33 | 1985 | 1725 | 135.5 | — | — | — | — | -45 | -15 | — | 60.0% | +0.80 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–0 | — | +1.32 |
| 23 | 1992 | 1606 | 119.1 | — | — | — | — | +1 | — | -25 | 43.3% | -0.63 | 4–5 (44%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.3 | +1.85 | 1986 | 1781 | 143.3 | — | — | — | — | +2 | -61 | -244 | 49.5% | +0.03 | 6–5 (55%) | 2–5 (29%) | 100.8 | -3.20 |
| 24 | 1993 | 1601 | 124.1 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -41 | +10 | 42.3% | -0.62 | 3–4 (43%) | 3–4 (43%) | 97.9 | -0.38 | 1987 | 1830 | 154.9 | — | — | — | — | -15 | +13 | — | 56.4% | +0.64 | 5–5 (50%) | 2–5 (29%) | 97.5 | -2.21 |
| 25 | 1994 | 1585 | 97.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1995 | 1551 | 111.6 | — | — | — | — | +11 | — | — | 44.4% | +0.07 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–4 (20%) | 95.2 | -0.10 | 1989 | 1659 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | +9 | +88 | — | 22.6% | -1.94 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | 99.6 | -0.02 |
| 27 | 1996 | 1564 | 110.4 | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | — | 55.0% | +0.25 | 1–3 (25%) | — | — | +0.74 | 1990 | 1622 | 106.2 | — | — | — | — | +31 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | — | — | — | +0.25 |
| Career | — | 1787 | 129.2 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -22 | -6 | 46.3% | -0.33 | 31–46 (40%) | 30–23 (57%) | 98.7 | +2.04 | — | 1871 | 143.4 | — | — | — | — | -12 | -7 | -244 | 51.7% | +0.26 | 19–19 (50%) | 8–16 (33%) | 97.5 | -1.22 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Kate Gompert
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Evert | 1 | 4 | 5 | May 22, 1987 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 1 | 3 | 4 | Nov 5, 1987 | H2H |
| Stephanie Rehe | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 12, 1987 | H2H |
| Hana Mandlikova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 26, 1990 | H2H |
| Pam Casale | 1 | 2 | 3 | Nov 12, 1987 | H2H |